Bonilla v. Dakota Premium Foods

Minnesota Supreme Court November 25, 2015

Bonilla v. Dakota Premium Foods, 871 N.W.2d 761 (Minn. 2015)

2015 Minn. LEXIS 713; 2015 WL 7752493

Anderson

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on January 6, 2015, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/G. Barry Anderson Associate Justice

Reference

Full Case Name: Maria BONILLA, Relator v. DAKOTA PREMIUM FOODS and ACE USA/ESIS, Center for Diagnostic Imaging, Ingco International, Inc., Injured Workers Pharmacy, Novacare Rehabilitation, Summit Orthopedics, and West Side Community Health Services, Intervenors
Status: Published