Bonilla v. Dakota Premium Foods
Bonilla v. Dakota Premium Foods
871 N.W.2d 761; 2015 Minn. LEXIS 713; 2015 WL 7752493
(North Western Reporter, Second Series)
Bonilla v. Dakota Premium Foods
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on January 6, 2015, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.