Minnesota Supreme Court, 2016

In re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Daniel L.M. KENNEDY, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0211321

In re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Daniel L.M. KENNEDY, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0211321
Minnesota Supreme Court · Decided February 24, 2016 · Stras
875 N.W.2d 847; 2016 Minn. LEXIS 98; 2016 WL 805733 (North Western Reporter, Second Series)

Can I rely on this case?

Citation treatment has not been reviewed for this case. The notes below come from the citation graph and the Minnesota Revisor's amendment records, not from a review of how later courts treated this decision.

(as of 9/30/2026)

Last cited by a Minnesota appellate court in 2019, among the opinions in this site’s citation index.

Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

See our Terms of Use before relying on these notes. Report an error

In re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Daniel L.M. KENNEDY, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0211321

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER.

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Daniel L.M. Kennedy committed professional' misconduct warranting public discipline — namely, bringing frivolous claims and violating court orders in a bankruptcy matter, see Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 3.1. 3.4(c), 3.4(d), and 8.4(d), and engaging in representation despite a conflict of interest, see Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.7(a)(2).

In a stipulation for discipline, respondent unconditionally admitted the allegations of the petition, except for one paragraph; waived his procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR); and with the Director recommended that the appropriate discipline is a public reprimand, .

Based upon all the flies, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Respondent Daniel L.M. Kennedy is publicly reprimanded; and
2. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR.

BY THE COURT:

/s/- David R. Stras Associate Justice

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.