Van Riper v. Interstate Packaging, Inc.
Minnesota Supreme Court
Van Riper v. Interstate Packaging, Inc., 874 N.W.2d 242 (Minn. 2016)
2016 Minn. LEXIS 24; 2016 WL 424672
Hudson
Van Riper v. Interstate Packaging, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed and served on June 26, 2015, be,. and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that [sjummary affirmances have no prece-dential value "because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees-.
BY THE COURT: •
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Joan Van RIPER, Employee-Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. INTERSTATE PACKAGING, INC., Employer-Relator/Cross-Appeal and Cincinnati Insurance Company, Insurer-Relator/Cross-Appeal and Mason City Clinic, Mason City Surgery Center, Mayo Clinic, Minnesota Department of Employment Economic Development, Spectrum Rehabilitation Services, Inc., Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota, and, UNUM Life Insurance Company, Intervenors
- Status
- Published