§ 103E.005

Minnesota Statutes
Source: 2025 Minnesota Statutes. For the official text, see revisor.mn.gov.

Citing Cases (14)

Minnesota Supreme Court

In Re Improvement of Murray County Ditch No. 34 · 2000 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Minnesota Court of Appeals

Kenneth H. Zimmermann, Gary C. Berndt v. Sauk River Watershed District · 2016 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Doug Blaine v. City of Sartell, County of Stearns · 2015 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Minch v. Buffalo-Red River Watershed District · 2006 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Agra Resources Coop v. Freeborn County Board of Commissioners · 2004 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

McLeod County Board of Commissioners v. State, Department of Natural Resources · 1996 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Byers · 1996 3 citations

+ 3 more citations in this opinion.

In Re the Commissioner's Order Denying Permit Application 93-1024 · 1995 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Anderson v. County of Stearns · 1994 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

In Re the Establishment of County Ditch No. 11 (Bevens Creek) · 1994 1 citation

On January 26, 1993, respondent Carver County Board of Commissioners (board), as drainage authority, dismissed appellant landowners’ (landowners) petition to establish a drainage system. See Minn. Stat. § 103E.005, subds. 9, 4 (1992) (a county board may serve as a drainage authority). The board ordered landowners to reimburse the board $81,222.35 for “costs and expenses” it incurred on landowners’ behalf during the proceeding, including $32,941.02 in interest. In their appeal to the district court, landowners contested the issue of reimbursement, but not the dismissal of their petition. The district court findings and order were dated June 24, 1993, and summary judgment for the board was entered on June 25, 1993. The summary judgment was appealed to this court on September 21,1993. We questioned the timeliness of the appeal.