§ 103E.011
Citing Cases (6)
Minnesota Supreme Court
In the Matter of Keystone Township v. Red Lake Watershed District, Paul Novacek, et ... · 2025 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Improvement of County Ditch No. 86, Branch 1 v. Phillips · 2001 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Minnesota Court of Appeals
State ex rel. Swan Lake Area Wildlife Ass'n v. Nicollet County Board of County Commissioners · 2011 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Agra Resources Coop v. Freeborn County Board of Commissioners · 2004 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Big Stone County Board of Commissioners · 2002 4 citations
Respondents Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, the Coalition for a Clean Minnesota River and the New Ulm Area Sportfishermen sought a declaratory judgment that a proposed repair to Big Stone County Ditch No. 2/2A (County Ditch 2) requires (1) permission of the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 103E.011, subd. 3; (2) a public waters work permit from the DNR pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 103G.245; (3) an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS); and (4) a wetland-replacement plan approved pursuant to Minn. Stat. §§ 103G.222 and 103G.2242.
Respondents Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, the Coalition for a Clean Minnesota River and the New Ulm Area Sportfishermen sought a declaratory judgment that a proposed repair to Big Stone County Ditch No. 2/2A (County Ditch 2) requires (1) permission of the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 103E.011, subd. 3; (2) a public waters work permit from the DNR pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 103G.245; (3) an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS); and (4) a wetland-replacement plan approved pursuant to Minn. Stat. §§ 103G.222 and 103G.2242.
Respondents Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, the Coalition for a Clean Minnesota River and the New Ulm Area Sportfishermen sought a declaratory judgment that a proposed repair to Big Stone County Ditch No. 2/2A (County Ditch 2) requires (1) permission of the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 103E.011, subd. 3; (2) a public waters work permit from the DNR pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 103G.245; (3) an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS); and (4) a wetland-replacement plan approved pursuant to Minn. Stat. §§ 103G.222 and 103G.2242.
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Pelican Group of Lakes Improvement District v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources · 1999 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.