§ 106A.091
Citing Cases (5)
Minnesota Supreme Court
Matter of Branch A-38, Jt. Ditch No. 204 · 1987 3 citations
+ 3 more citations in this opinion.
Minnesota Court of Appeals
Pestka v. County of Blue Earth · 2002 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
In Re the Establishment of County Ditch No. 11 (Bevens Creek) · 1994 2 citations
In a 1985 reorganization of the drainage law, the legislature divided section 106.631 into two provisions. See Minn. Stat. §§ 106A.091 and 106A.095 (Supp.1985); see also 1985 Minn.Laws ch. 172, §§ 1-92 (reco-difying chapter 106 as chapter 106A); 132 (stating that the recodification was “a clarification and reorganization of the drainage law”). Each section referred to certain appeals to the district court previously grouped together under section 106.631; but the time for appeal from final orders or judgments of the district court was only included in section 106A.095. Compare Minn. Stat. § 106.631 (1984) with Minn. Stat. §§ 106A.091 and 106A.095 (Supp.1985). The legislature, however, expressly stated that the recodification was “not intended to alter the drainage law and shall not be construed by a court or other authority to alter the meaning of the law.” 1985 Minn.Laws ch. 172, § 132.
In a 1985 reorganization of the drainage law, the legislature divided section 106.631 into two provisions. See Minn. Stat. §§ 106A.091 and 106A.095 (Supp.1985); see also 1985 Minn.Laws ch. 172, §§ 1-92 (reco-difying chapter 106 as chapter 106A); 132 (stating that the recodification was “a clarification and reorganization of the drainage law”). Each section referred to certain appeals to the district court previously grouped together under section 106.631; but the time for appeal from final orders or judgments of the district court was only included in section 106A.095. Compare Minn. Stat. § 106.631 (1984) with Minn. Stat. §§ 106A.091 and 106A.095 (Supp.1985). The legislature, however, expressly stated that the recodification was “not intended to alter the drainage law and shall not be construed by a court or other authority to alter the meaning of the law.” 1985 Minn.Laws ch. 172, § 132.
In re the Appeal of Holasek · 1989 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
In re Schwarze · 1988 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.