§ 10A.01

State of Minnesota v. Jaimiah Lamar Irby · 2014 4 citations

+ 4 more citations in this opinion.

Begin v. Ritchie · 2013 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

MN CITIZENS CONCERNED FOR LIFE v. Kelley · 2005 11 citations

+ 11 more citations in this opinion.

Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. Kelley · 2005 10 citations

+ 10 more citations in this opinion.

Riley v. Jankowski · 2006 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux (Dakota) Community v. Minnesota Campaign Finance & Public Disclosure Board · 1998 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Winberg v. University of Minnesota · 1992 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Minnesota Chamber of Commerce v. Choi · 2023 6 citations

define candidate. Section 10A.01 does. It defines candidate as “an individual who seeks nomination or election as a state constitutional officer, legislator, or judge.” Minn. Stat. § 10A.01 subdiv. 10. In other words, § 10A.01 expressly defines a candidate as an individual running for state office. The Chamber counters that Minn. Stat. § 211B.01 defines candidate as “an

Legislature amended § 215B.15 to expressly incorporate § 10A.01’s definitions. See 2023 Minnesota Laws Chapter 34, art. 3, sec. 3–6. And § 215B.15 subdivision 4a relies on multiple definitions from § 10A.01, including political committee, Minn. Stat. § 10A.01 subdiv. 27, political fund, id. subdiv. 28, political party unit, id. subdiv. 30, ballot question, id. subdiv. 7, contribution, id. subdiv. 11, and expenditure, id. subdiv. 9. None of those terms are defined by § 211B.01 or § 211B.15 subdivision 1. It is not plausible that the Minnesota Legislature incorporated all of those terms expressly limited to state elections

Legislature amended § 215B.15 to expressly incorporate § 10A.01’s definitions. See 2023 Minnesota Laws Chapter 34, art. 3, sec. 3–6. And § 215B.15 subdivision 4a relies on multiple definitions from § 10A.01, including political committee, Minn. Stat. § 10A.01 subdiv. 27, political fund, id. subdiv. 28, political party unit, id. subdiv. 30, ballot question, id. subdiv. 7, contribution, id. subdiv. 11, and expenditure, id. subdiv. 9. None of those terms are defined by § 211B.01 or § 211B.15 subdivision 1. It is not plausible that the Minnesota Legislature incorporated all of those terms expressly limited to state elections

+ 3 more citations in this opinion.

Pitman Farms v. Kuehl Poultry LLC · 2020 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Seaton v. Wiener · 2014 4 citations

+ 4 more citations in this opinion.

Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. Swanson · 2010 14 citations

+ 14 more citations in this opinion.

Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. Kelley · 2003 12 citations

+ 12 more citations in this opinion.

Republican Party of Minnesota v. Pauly · 1999 10 citations

The above-titled matter came on for hearing before the undersigned United States District Judge on July 22, 1999, pursuant to the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment [Doc. Nos. 25, 35], Plaintiffs Republican Party of Minnesota, Kevin Knight, and Rich Pogin filed the instant action, on July 14, 1998, seeking to enjoin the State of Minnesota from enforcing a portion of the Ethics in Government Act, Minn. Stat. § 10A.01, subd. 10b. In a July 24, 1998 Order, this Court denied Plaintiffs’ request for a temporary re *1010 straining order. After extensive discovery, both parties now move for summary judgment.

The above-titled matter came on for hearing before the undersigned United States District Judge on July 22, 1999, pursuant to the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment [Doc. Nos. 25, 35], Plaintiffs Republican Party of Minnesota, Kevin Knight, and Rich Pogin filed the instant action, on July 14, 1998, seeking to enjoin the State of Minnesota from enforcing a portion of the Ethics in Government Act, Minn. Stat. § 10A.01, subd. 10b. In a July 24, 1998 Order, this Court denied Plaintiffs’ request for a temporary re *1010 straining order. After extensive discovery, both parties now move for summary judgment.

The above-titled matter came on for hearing before the undersigned United States District Judge on July 22, 1999, pursuant to the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment [Doc. Nos. 25, 35], Plaintiffs Republican Party of Minnesota, Kevin Knight, and Rich Pogin filed the instant action, on July 14, 1998, seeking to enjoin the State of Minnesota from enforcing a portion of the Ethics in Government Act, Minn. Stat. § 10A.01, subd. 10b. In a July 24, 1998 Order, this Court denied Plaintiffs’ request for a temporary re *1010 straining order. After extensive discovery, both parties now move for summary judgment.

+ 7 more citations in this opinion.

Day v. Hayes · 1994 4 citations

Minn. Stat. § 10A.01 Subd. 10b (Supp.1993).

MCCL further contends that Subdivision 2 unconstitutionally restricts the right of individuals to participate in the political process. By its terms, the statute applies only to corporations, not to the conduct of individuals. See Minn. Stat. § 211B.15 subd. 2. “[Services provided without compensation by an individual volunteering personal time on behalf of a candidate, ballot question, political committee or political fund” are expressly excluded from the distinct statutes governing individual political contributions. See Minn. Stat. §§ 10A.01, subd. 7 & 10A.27, subd. 1. Subdivision 2 does not apply to individuals and does not limit their First Amendment rights.

Minn. Stat. § 10A.01 Subd. 10b (Supp.1993).

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Bang v. Chase · 1977 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.