§ 115A.87

Ben Oehrleins & Sons & Daughter, Inc. v. Hennepin County · 1994 4 citations

Minn. Stat. § 115A.87. 7 The Metropolitan Council approved the County’s designation on February 11, 1986. 8 Thus, the County reasons that plaintiffs were required to bring the present action against Ordinance 12 no later than April 14, 1986. The argument is unavailing. The statute upon which the County relies does not, and indeed could not, create a limitations period for challenges to designation ordinances based on the United States Constitution.

Minn. Stat. § 115A.87. 7 The Metropolitan Council approved the County’s designation on February 11, 1986. 8 Thus, the County reasons that plaintiffs were required to bring the present action against Ordinance 12 no later than April 14, 1986. The argument is unavailing. The statute upon which the County relies does not, and indeed could not, create a limitations period for challenges to designation ordinances based on the United States Constitution.

Minn. Stat. § 115A.87. 7 The Metropolitan Council approved the County’s designation on February 11, 1986. 8 Thus, the County reasons that plaintiffs were required to bring the present action against Ordinance 12 no later than April 14, 1986. The argument is unavailing. The statute upon which the County relies does not, and indeed could not, create a limitations period for challenges to designation ordinances based on the United States Constitution.

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.