§ 115B.02

Minnesota Statutes
Source: 2025 Minnesota Statutes. For the official text, see revisor.mn.gov.

Citing Cases (12)

Minnesota Supreme Court

Dealers Manufacturing, Co. v. County of Anoka · 2000 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Westling v. County of Mille Lacs · 1998 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Northern States Power Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York · 1994 1 citation

."Response costs" is a term of art defined by neither the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERC-LA or Superfund Act), 42 U.S.C. § 9601-57, nor the Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act, Minn. Stat. ch. 115B; however, both acts define "respond” and "response" as "remove, removal, remedy, and remedial action.” 42 U.S.C. § 9601(24) (1988); Minn. Stat. § 115B.02 subd. 18 (1992).

Minnesota Court of Appeals

Renee Hogendorf, Respondent, vs. James J. Green, Jr., et al., Appellants · 2025 9 citations

+ 9 more citations in this opinion.

State Ex Rel. Hatch v. Employers Insurance of Wausau · 2002 5 citations

+ 5 more citations in this opinion.

Jindra v. City of St. Anthony · 1995 3 citations

+ 3 more citations in this opinion.

Musicland Group, Inc. v. Ceridian Corp. · 1993 7 citations

Minn. Stat. § 115B.02, subd. 17 (1990) (emphasis added).

Minn. Stat. § 115B.02, subd. 17 (1990) (emphasis added).

Minn. Stat. § 115B.02, subd. 17 (1990) (emphasis added).

+ 4 more citations in this opinion.

Weber v. Gerads Development · 1989 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State v. McAllister · 1987 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

U.S. District Court, D. Minnesota

Regents of the University of Minnesota v. United States of America · 2022 4 citations

+ 4 more citations in this opinion.

Soo Line Railroad v. B.J. Carney & Co. · 1997 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Gopher Oil Co. v. Union Oil Co. of California · 1990 6 citations

+ 6 more citations in this opinion.