§ 115C.09
Citing Cases (5)
Minnesota Supreme Court
Moorhead Economic Development Authority v. Anda · 2010 3 citations
+ 3 more citations in this opinion.
Minnesota Court of Appeals
GH Holdings, LLC v. Minnesota Department of Commerce · 2013 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Steiner v. Beaudry Oil & Service, Inc. · 1996 2 citations
Appellants Paul M. and Deborah A. Steiner sued respondent Beaudry Oil & Service, Inc., d/b/a Beaudry Oil Company and Car Wash (Beaudry Oil), claiming negligence after fuel oil leaked out of a storage tank and damaged their property. Beaudiy Oil had delivered the fuel oil to them home. Beaudry *41 Oil appeals from the trial court’s denial of its motions for a new trial and for an equitable lien. We affirm because the trial court (1) properly instructed the jury and allowed comment by counsel under Minn.R.Civ.P. 49.01(b); (2) properly refused to grant Beau-dry Oil an equitable lien against any reimbursement the Steiners might receive under Minn. Stat. § 115C.09 (1994); and (3) committed no evidentiary or other reversible errors.
Appellants Paul M. and Deborah A. Steiner sued respondent Beaudry Oil & Service, Inc., d/b/a Beaudry Oil Company and Car Wash (Beaudry Oil), claiming negligence after fuel oil leaked out of a storage tank and damaged their property. Beaudiy Oil had delivered the fuel oil to them home. Beaudry *41 Oil appeals from the trial court’s denial of its motions for a new trial and for an equitable lien. We affirm because the trial court (1) properly instructed the jury and allowed comment by counsel under Minn.R.Civ.P. 49.01(b); (2) properly refused to grant Beau-dry Oil an equitable lien against any reimbursement the Steiners might receive under Minn. Stat. § 115C.09 (1994); and (3) committed no evidentiary or other reversible errors.
Application of Q Petroleum · 1993 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Application of Crown CoCo, Inc. · 1990 3 citations
+ 3 more citations in this opinion.