On August 28,1984, four of the veterans filed an action in Hennepin County District Court challenging the transfer/discharge proceedings. The veterans alleged, inter alia, that the inadequate notice received and the procedures proposed violated their rights under Minnesota statutes and would deprive them of due process of law as guaranteed by the fourteenth amendment of the United States Constitution and article I, section 7 of the Minnesota Constitution. The veterans further alleged that they were entitled to a hearing, under due process, prior to their transfer/discharge under the fourteenth amendment. Finally, they claimed that, under the Minnesota Administrative Procedures Act, Minn. Stat. § 14.02, subd. 3 (1984) (MAPA), the hearing required by the constitution must be a contested case hearing under MAPA, Minn. Stat. § 14.57, et seq. (1984). The veterans sought declaratory and injunctive relief, including: a declaration that the lack of proper procedures and the inadequate notice violated their federal due process rights; an order that respondents grant contested case hearings prior to discharge; a temporary and permanent injunction prohibiting discharge/transfer until rules had been promulgated and contested case hearings held; and attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (1982). The complaint did not specifically allege that relief was requested pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982).

Bahr v. City of Litchfield · 1988 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Application of Northwestern Bell Telephone · 1986 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications Partnership · 1984 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Swenson v. State, Department of Public Welfare · 1983 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Minnesota Court of Appeals

Partners in Nutrition d/b/a Partners in Quality Care Appeal of MDE Decision Child and Adult Care Food Program December ... · 2023 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

In re Midway Pro Bowl Relocation Benefits Claim · 2019 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

In re Minn. Living Assistance, Inc. · 2018 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Partners in Nutrition's Appeal of Disapproval of Site Expansion in the CACFP Program · 2017 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Partners in Nutrition's Appeal of Disapproval of Site Expansion in the CACFP Program · 2017 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

In the Matter of Unity Health Care, Class F Home License No. 352187 and Unity Home Care, Inc., Class A Professional Home Care License No. 353694. · 2017 1 citation

revoking and refusing to renew its licenses because: (1) Minn. Stat. § 14.02 (2014) requires

Water in Motion, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, Minnesota Plumbing Board · 2016 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

In the Matter of the Petition of Northern States Power Company, d/b/a Xcel Energy, for Approval of Its Proposed Community Solar Garden Program. · 2016 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Minnesota Environmental Science and Economic Review Board v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency · 2015 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

United States Steel Corporation, Relator v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency · 2015 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

· 2015 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Waste Management of Minnesota, Inc. v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency · 2014 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Minnesota Transitions Charter School v. Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Education · 2014 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Constans v. Commissioner of Public Safety · 2013 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

In re Pera Salary Determinations Affecting Retired & Active Employees · 2012 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

In Re the Claim for Benefits by Jerve · 2008 2 citations

Relator argues that the panel’s decision is void because the panel did not comply with the requirements for a contested-case proceeding under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), Minnesota *407 Statutes chapter 14. 1 After questioning jurisdiction and reviewing the parties’ submissions, by special-term order, this court determined that this proceeding is not a contested case as defined by the APA. The APA defines a “contested case” as “a proceeding before an agency in which the legal rights ... of specific parties are required by law ... to be determined after an agency hearing.” Minn. Stat. § 14.02, subd. 3 (2006); see also' Minn. Stat. § 14.02, subd. 2 (2006) (defining agency). The panel has the authority to determine eligibility for continued health coverage but is not required to initiate a contested-case proceeding. Minn. Stat. § 299A.465, subd. 7 (2006). Because this was not a contested case, the panel did not need to comply with the requirements for a contested-case proceeding under the APA.

In the Matter of Petition of N. St. Power · 2004 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Hare v. State, Department of Human Services · 2003 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

In Re Relocation Benefits of James Bros. Furniture, Inc. · 2002 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Weber v. Hvass · 2001 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Hard Times Cafe, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis · 2001 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

E.N. v. Special School District No. 1 · 1999 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

L & D Trucking v. Minnesota Department of Transportation · 1999 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

In Re Dakota Telecommunications Group · 1999 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Brula v. St. Louis County · 1999 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux (Dakota) Community v. Minnesota Campaign Finance & Public Disclosure Board · 1998 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

In Re the Proposal by Lakedale Telephone Co. to Offer Three Additional Class Services · 1997 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Heideman v. Metropolitan Airports Commission · 1996 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Claim of City of Mankato v. Mahoney · 1996 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Axelson v. Minneapolis Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'n · 1995 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Matter of Intra-Lata Equal Access · 1995 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Contel of Minnesota, Inc. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission · 1995 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

In Re Assessment Issued to Leisure Hills Health Care Center on March 2, 1992 · 1994 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Application of Q Petroleum · 1993 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Res Investment Co. v. County of Dakota · 1992 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Evenson v. Minnesota Department of Human Services · 1992 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Faribault County v. Minnesota Department of Transportation · 1991 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Donovan Contracting of St. Cloud, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation · 1991 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Minnesota Chamber of Commerce v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency · 1991 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

In Re the Appeal of Jongquist · 1990 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Application of Crown CoCo, Inc. · 1990 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

In re Amendment No. 4 to Air Emission Facility Permit No. 2021-85-OT-1 · 1990 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

City of Minneapolis v. Johnson · 1990 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

In Re Complaint of People's Cooperative Power Ass'n · 1989 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Sa-Ag, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation · 1989 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Mankato Aglime & Rock Co. v. City of Mankato · 1989 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Contested Case of Ebenezer Society v. Minnesota Department of Human Services · 1988 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

M.T. Properties, Inc. v. Alexander · 1988 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Matter of Hibbing Taconite Co. · 1988 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Good Neighbor Care Centers, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services · 1988 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Lewis v. Commissioner of Jobs & Training · 1988 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

In Re the Solid Waste Permit for the NSP Red Wing Ash Disposal Facility · 1988 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

L.K. v. Gregg · 1987 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

In Re the Proposed Discharge of Larkin · 1987 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. Commissioner of Commerce · 1987 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Application of Orr · 1986 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

L.K. v. Gregg · 1986 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Contested Case of Laura Baker School Ass'n v. Department of Human Services · 1985 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Voettiner v. Commissioner of Education · 1985 2 citations

Voettiner contends she has a statutory right to a contested case hearing based on Minn. Stat. § 14.02 (1984).

Blanding v. Sports & Health Club, Inc. · 1985 1 citation

Minneapolis Civil Rights Ordinance and Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act 1. The Minneapolis Code of Ordinances provides for judicial review of decisions made by the Civil Rights Commission: Any person aggrieved by a final decision of a hearing committee or a review committee in a contested case, may seek judicial review in the district court as provided in Chapter 15 of Minnesota Statutes, the Administrative Procedure Act, and the District Court shall review the decision in conformance with the provisions of this Title. Minneapolis, Minn., Code § 141.60(b) (1976 & Supp. No. 6, 6-82). The Administrative Procedure Act formerly Chapter 15 of the Minnesota Statutes, has been renumbered and is now found at Minn. Stat. §§ 14.01-.70 (1982 & Supp.1983). In 1982, when the ordinance was promulgated, the APA provided for judicial review in the district court. See Minn. Stat. § 14.63 (1982). Effective August 1, 1983, however, the APA was amended to take into account this court's existence, and § 14.63 now provides for an appeal to this court. See 1983 Minn. Laws ch. 247, § 9, at 856 (amending Minn. Stat. § 14.63 (1982)). The statute defining this court's jurisdiction is consistent with the amended APA and gives this court jurisdiction to hear, inter alia, "the decisions of administrative agencies in contested cases, as provided in sections 14.63 to 14.69." Minn. Stat. § 480A.06, subd. 4 (Supp.1983). By its own terms the Administrative Procedure Act does not provide for review of local agency decisions. The APA, both formerly and as amended, provides for review of decisions in "contested cases." See Minn. Stat. §§ 14.63, 480A.06, subd. 4. A *794 "contested case" is defined as a "proceeding before an agency," § 14.02, subd. 3, and agencies are defined as bodies having "statewide jurisdiction." Minn. Stat. § 14.02, subd. 2. Because the Minneapolis Civil Rights Commission is an agency of local government rather than an agency with statewide jurisdiction, the decision appealed from was not a decision in a "contested case" as defined by the APA, and thus the combination of § 14.63 and § 480A.06 do not confer jurisdiction on this court to hear the matter.

Hanna Mining Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission · 1985 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Application of Northwestern Bell Telephone · 1985 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Insurance Federation of Minnesota v. Hatch · 1985 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. Northern States Power Co. · 1985 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Stearns-Hotzfield v. Farmers Insurance Exchange · 1985 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Benson v. Commissioner of Public Safety · 1984 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.