§ 144.293
Citing Cases (11)
Minnesota Supreme Court
William Findling v. Group Health Plan, Inc., d/b/a Health Partners and Regions Hospital, ... · 2023 10 citations
5 See, e.g., Minn. Stat. § 144.293 (2022) (release and disclosure of health records); Minn. Stat. § 144.294 (2022) (disclosure of mental health records); Minn. Stat. § 144.295 (2022) (disclosure of health records for external research). 6 The statute involves a nuanced balancing of the interests of patients and providers and includes exceptions to disclosure which are not relevant to the resolution of this appeal.
+ 9 more citations in this opinion.
Jerry Expose, Jr. v. Thad Wilderson & Associates, P.A., Nina Mattson · 2017 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Jerry Expose, Jr. v. Thad Wilderson & Associates, P.A., Nina Mattson · 2016 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Jacky L. Larson v. The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, CMInformation Specialists, Inc. · 2014 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Minnesota Court of Appeals
Jerry Expose, Jr. v. Thad Wilderson & Associates, P. A., Nina Mattson · 2015 4 citations
+ 4 more citations in this opinion.
Anthony Patrick Huber v. Jason R. Vohnoutka, Darlene Heimerl · 2015 8 citations
+ 8 more citations in this opinion.
S.F. v. Clay County · 2014 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
U.S. District Court, D. Minnesota
Okash v. Essentia Health · 2025 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Mekhail v. North Memorial Health Care · 2024 4 citations
+ 4 more citations in this opinion.
Okash v. Essentia Health · 2024 4 citations
+ 4 more citations in this opinion.
In re: Group Health Plan Litigation · 2023 4 citations
Plaintiffs allege that HealthPartners violated the Minnesota Health Records Act (“MHRA”). The MHRA prohibits healthcare providers from “release[ing] a patient’s health records to a person” without the patient’s consent or “specific authorization in law.” Minn. Stat. § 144.293, subd. 2. HealthPartners argues Count I must be dismissed because Plaintiffs have not plausibly alleged that HealthPartners disclosed their “health records” to a third party.
Plaintiffs allege that HealthPartners violated the Minnesota Health Records Act (“MHRA”). The MHRA prohibits healthcare providers from “release[ing] a patient’s health records to a person” without the patient’s consent or “specific authorization in law.” Minn. Stat. § 144.293, subd. 2. HealthPartners argues Count I must be dismissed because Plaintiffs have not plausibly alleged that HealthPartners disclosed their “health records” to a third party.
Plaintiffs allege that HealthPartners violated the Minnesota Health Records Act (“MHRA”). The MHRA prohibits healthcare providers from “release[ing] a patient’s health records to a person” without the patient’s consent or “specific authorization in law.” Minn. Stat. § 144.293, subd. 2. HealthPartners argues Count I must be dismissed because Plaintiffs have not plausibly alleged that HealthPartners disclosed their “health records” to a third party.
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.