§ 148.975

Minnesota Statutes
Source: 2025 Minnesota Statutes. For the official text, see revisor.mn.gov.

Citing Cases (7)

Minnesota Supreme Court

State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Ryan James Martens, Appellant · 2025 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Jerry Expose, Jr. v. Thad Wilderson & Associates, P.A., Nina Mattson · 2017 11 citations

+ 11 more citations in this opinion.

Jerry Expose, Jr. v. Thad Wilderson & Associates, P.A., Nina Mattson · 2016 8 citations

+ 8 more citations in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. Jerry Expose, Jr. · 2015 4 citations

+ 4 more citations in this opinion.

Minnesota Court of Appeals

Jerry Expose, Jr. v. Thad Wilderson & Associates, P. A., Nina Mattson · 2015 6 citations

+ 6 more citations in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. Jerry Expose, Jr. · 2014 3 citations

In addition, the legislature created another exception to the psychologist-client privilege in statutes pertaining to civil-commitment proceedings, specifically providing that “[a]ny privilege otherwise existing between ... patient and psychologist ... is waived as to any ... psychologist ... who provides information with respect to a patient.” Minn. Stat. § 253B.23, subd. 4 (2012). No similar language waiving the psychologist-client privilege is present in any other Minnesota law, including Minnesota’s duty-to-warn statute. See Minn. Stat. § 148.975, subd. 2.

In addition, the legislature created another exception to the psychologist-client privilege in statutes pertaining to civil-commitment proceedings, specifically providing that “[a]ny privilege otherwise existing between ... patient and psychologist ... is waived as to any ... psychologist ... who provides information with respect to a patient.” Minn. Stat. § 253B.23, subd. 4 (2012). No similar language waiving the psychologist-client privilege is present in any other Minnesota law, including Minnesota’s duty-to-warn statute. See Minn. Stat. § 148.975, subd. 2.

In addition, the legislature created another exception to the psychologist-client privilege in statutes pertaining to civil-commitment proceedings, specifically providing that “[a]ny privilege otherwise existing between ... patient and psychologist ... is waived as to any ... psychologist ... who provides information with respect to a patient.” Minn. Stat. § 253B.23, subd. 4 (2012). No similar language waiving the psychologist-client privilege is present in any other Minnesota law, including Minnesota’s duty-to-warn statute. See Minn. Stat. § 148.975, subd. 2.

Culberson v. Chapman · 1993 4 citations

+ 4 more citations in this opinion.