§ 152.092
Citing Cases (24)
Minnesota Supreme Court
State v. Hunn · 2018 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State of Minnesota v. Leona Rose deLottinville · 2017 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
State of Minnesota v. Jose Martin Lugo, Jr. · 2016 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
State of Minnesota v. Erica Ann Rohde · 2014 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
State v. Brooks · 2013 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State v. Hanson · 2011 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State v. Hatfield · 2002 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State v. Wynne · 1996 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Minnesota Court of Appeals
State of Minnesota v. Ely Ovis Emmanuel Ana El Sabahot · 2016 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State of Minnesota v. Patrick James Buswell · 2016 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State of Minnesota v. Jose Martin Lugo, Jr. · 2016 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State of Minnesota v. Joshua Nathan Benvie, Appellant.. · 2016 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: L. S. H., Child. · 2015 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State of Minnesota v. Mario Gonzalez · 2015 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Elson Randall · 2014 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Gene Hoberg · 2014 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State v. Knoch · 2010 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
State v. Enoch · 2010 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
State v. Bradley · 2008 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State v. Hager · 2007 1 citation
The state emphasizes that the record also indicates that by rolling on the floor in front of the barrel stove, appellant temporarily prevented the officers from opening the stove and delayed or prevented discovery of what Samuel had thrown inside the stove. The toxic smoke that sickened one of the officers is evidence that there was a potent substance inside and that appellant’s obstructionist activity may have prevented discovery of that substance. Also, the officers eventually found a glass pipe inside the stove. Samuel Hager admitted that he tossed that pipe in the stove. This was arguably a pipe used to smoke methamphetamine. The jury may have decided that possession of such a pipe by Samuel was a criminal act. See Minn. Stat. § 152.092 (2004) (providing that possession of drug paraphernalia is a petty misdemeanor).
State v. Borrego · 2003 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State v. Reese · 1989 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
State v. Johnson · 1988 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
U.S. District Court, D. Minnesota
Hough v. Shakopee Public Schools · 2009 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.