§ 169.01
Citing Cases (36)
Minnesota Supreme Court
State v. Tanksley · 2012 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State v. Larsen · 2002 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Jasper v. Commissioner of Public Safety · 2002 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Castor v. City of Minneapolis · 1988 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Melby v. Commissioner of Public Safety · 1985 5 citations
(1) We affirm the holding of both the trial court and the Court of Appeals that for Minn. Stat. § 169.123 (1984) to apply, the snowmobile must be operated on a street or highway. Both Minn. Stat. §§ 169.121 and 169.123 (1984) are remedial statutes to be broadly construed in favor of the public interest in removing inebriated drivers from our streets and highways. See Heddan v. Dirkswager, 336 N.W.2d 54 (Minn.1983); State Department of Public Safety v. Juncewski, 308 N.W.2d 316 (Minn.1981). No dispute exists that a snowmobile is a “device * * * upon, or by which any person * * * may be transported ⅜ * * upon a highway.” Since it is self-propelled, it is both a “vehicle” under Minn. Stat. § 169.01, subd. 2. (1984), and a “motor vehicle” under Minn. Stat. § 169.01, subd. 3 (1984). Finally, application of Minn. Stat. § 169.123 is not restricted to conduct for which a driver’s license is required, Schaf *529
(1) We affirm the holding of both the trial court and the Court of Appeals that for Minn. Stat. § 169.123 (1984) to apply, the snowmobile must be operated on a street or highway. Both Minn. Stat. §§ 169.121 and 169.123 (1984) are remedial statutes to be broadly construed in favor of the public interest in removing inebriated drivers from our streets and highways. See Heddan v. Dirkswager, 336 N.W.2d 54 (Minn.1983); State Department of Public Safety v. Juncewski, 308 N.W.2d 316 (Minn.1981). No dispute exists that a snowmobile is a “device * * * upon, or by which any person * * * may be transported ⅜ * * upon a highway.” Since it is self-propelled, it is both a “vehicle” under Minn. Stat. § 169.01, subd. 2. (1984), and a “motor vehicle” under Minn. Stat. § 169.01, subd. 3 (1984). Finally, application of Minn. Stat. § 169.123 is not restricted to conduct for which a driver’s license is required, Schaf *529
(1) We affirm the holding of both the trial court and the Court of Appeals that for Minn. Stat. § 169.123 (1984) to apply, the snowmobile must be operated on a street or highway. Both Minn. Stat. §§ 169.121 and 169.123 (1984) are remedial statutes to be broadly construed in favor of the public interest in removing inebriated drivers from our streets and highways. See Heddan v. Dirkswager, 336 N.W.2d 54 (Minn.1983); State Department of Public Safety v. Juncewski, 308 N.W.2d 316 (Minn.1981). No dispute exists that a snowmobile is a “device * * * upon, or by which any person * * * may be transported ⅜ * * upon a highway.” Since it is self-propelled, it is both a “vehicle” under Minn. Stat. § 169.01, subd. 2. (1984), and a “motor vehicle” under Minn. Stat. § 169.01, subd. 3 (1984). Finally, application of Minn. Stat. § 169.123 is not restricted to conduct for which a driver’s license is required, Schaf *529
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Apple Valley Red-E-Mix, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public Safety · 1984 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Minnesota Court of Appeals
State v. Wenz · 2010 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Wilkes v. Commissioner of Public Safety · 2010 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
State v. Kuhlman · 2006 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
State v. Strandness · 2004 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Duncan v. Commissioner of Public Safety · 2004 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
State v. Jones · 2002 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
State v. Sherbrooke · 2001 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Bond v. Commissioner of Public Safety · 1997 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Ka Ying Vue v. State Farm Insurance Companies · 1997 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Boschee v. Duevel · 1995 4 citations
+ 4 more citations in this opinion.
Great American Insurance Co. v. Golla · 1992 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Mickelson v. Travelers Insurance Co. · 1992 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Hewitt v. City of Montrose · 1992 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Cummins v. Klenk · 1991 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State v. Peterson · 1990 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Ruzic v. Commissioner of Public Safety · 1990 6 citations
+ 6 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Welfare of R.M.J. · 1989 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State v. Langaas · 1988 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Kemmer v. Commissioner of Public Safety · 1988 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Abeln v. Commissioner of Public Safety · 1987 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Jam v. Independent School Dist. No. 709 · 1987 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
City of Springfield v. Anderson · 1987 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Pahl v. Commissioner of Public Safety · 1986 3 citations
+ 3 more citations in this opinion.
Ahrens v. Commissioner of Public Safety · 1986 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Schultz v. Commissioner of Public Safety · 1986 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State v. DeGier · 1986 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Pischke v. Kellen · 1986 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Genia v. Commissioner of Public Safety · 1986 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Melby v. Commissioner of Public Safety · 1984 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
U.S. District Court, D. Minnesota
King Ex Rel. King v. Liberty Homes, Inc. · 2007 4 citations
+ 4 more citations in this opinion.