Minn. Stat. § 480A.06

State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Diamond Lee Jamal Griffin, Appellant · 2025 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State v. Ali · 2011 3 citations [Concurrence]

+ 3 more citations in this opinion.

Rickert v. State · 2011 1 citation [Concurrence]

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State v. Warren · 1999 2 citations

We turn now to the state’s appeal of Warren’s sentence. The state appealed Warren’s sentence of three concurrent life sentences to the court of appeals, which dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 35 Under Minn. Stat. § 480A.06 (1998), the court of appeals lacks jurisdiction over criminal appeals in cases in which the defendant has been convicted of murder in the first degree. Therefore, the court of appeals’ dismissal of the state’s appeal was proper.

We turn now to the state’s appeal of Warren’s sentence. The state appealed Warren’s sentence of three concurrent life sentences to the court of appeals, which dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 35 Under Minn. Stat. § 480A.06 (1998), the court of appeals lacks jurisdiction over criminal appeals in cases in which the defendant has been convicted of murder in the first degree. Therefore, the court of appeals’ dismissal of the state’s appeal was proper.

In Re Complaint Against the Sandy Pappas Senate Committee · 1992 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Harms v. Independent School District No. 300 · 1990 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Strand v. Special School District No. 1 · 1986 3 citations

+ 3 more citations in this opinion.

White Bear Rod and Gun Club v. City of Hugo · 1986 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

In re Defense and Indemnification of Alexander Vladimir Brown · 2025 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Bradley Tipka, Relator v. Lincoln International Charter School · 2015 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. A. Y. G., a/k/a A. Y. L. · 2014 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Ken B. Peterson, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry v. United Parcel Service, Inc. · 2014 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

In Re Paternity of JMV · 2003 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Valento v. Swenson · 2003 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Heideman v. Metropolitan Airports Commission · 1996 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Rodne v. Commissioner of Human Services · 1996 1 citation

The DHS is not required to conduct a contested case proceeding when an individual requests reconsideration under Minn. Stat. § 245A.04, subd. 3b, and it did not do so when Rodne requested reconsideration. Therefore, Rodne’s certiorari appeal is before this court pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 480A.06, subd. 3 (1994) and Minn. Stat. ch. 606 (1994), rather than the Administrative Procedure Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 14.63-.69 (1994).

Axelson v. Minneapolis Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'n · 1995 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Rocco Altobelli, Inc. v. State, Department of Commerce · 1994 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Township of Honner v. Redwood County · 1994 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

In Re Complaint Against the Sandy Pappas Senate Committee · 1992 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Arden Properties v. Anderson · 1991 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

American Dog Owners Ass'n v. City of Minneapolis · 1990 1 citation

ADOA argues that a judicial-type hearing is required. We disagree. A judicial-type hearing would not afford additional safeguards since the ordinance provides a pre-deprivation hearing rather than a post-deprivation hearing. Additionally, we note that decisions of public officials are reviewable by certiorari. » See Minn. Stat. § 480A.06, subd. 3 (1988).

Silver Bay Area Citizens Concerned for Quality Education v. Lake Superior School District No. 381 · 1989 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Nichols v. Borst · 1989 1 citation

Minn. Stat. § 480A.06, subd. 3 (1986) provides that “[t]he court of appeals shall have jurisdiction to issue writs of certiorari to all agencies, public corporations and public officials.” The statute’s failure to expressly include relief associations acting as an agency is not fatal to this court’s certiorari review. See Strand v. Special School District No. 1, 392 N.W.2d 881, 883 (Minn.1986). The court of appeals has been “generally substituted * * * for the district court in those areas in which the latter court acted in an appellate capacity.” Id.

M.T. Properties, Inc. v. Alexander · 1988 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

EPA Audio Visual, Inc. v. State · 1988 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Doe v. Minnesota State Board of Medical Examiners · 1988 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Peterson v. City of Minneapolis · 1987 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

In re Mostrom · 1986 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

White Bear Rod and Gun Club v. City of Hugo · 1986 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Blanding v. Sports & Health Club, Inc. · 1985 4 citations

Minneapolis Civil Rights Ordinance and Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act 1. The Minneapolis Code of Ordinances provides for judicial review of decisions made by the Civil Rights Commission: Any person aggrieved by a final decision of a hearing committee or a review committee in a contested case, may seek judicial review in the district court as provided in Chapter 15 of Minnesota Statutes, the Administrative Procedure Act, and the District Court shall review the decision in conformance with the provisions of this Title. Minneapolis, Minn., Code § 141.60(b) (1976 & Supp. No. 6, 6-82). The Administrative Procedure Act formerly Chapter 15 of the Minnesota Statutes, has been renumbered and is now found at Minn. Stat. §§ 14.01-.70 (1982 & Supp.1983). In 1982, when the ordinance was promulgated, the APA provided for judicial review in the district court. See Minn. Stat. § 14.63 (1982). Effective August 1, 1983, however, the APA was amended to take into account this court's existence, and § 14.63 now provides for an appeal to this court. See 1983 Minn. Laws ch. 247, § 9, at 856 (amending Minn. Stat. § 14.63 (1982)). The statute defining this court's jurisdiction is consistent with the amended APA and gives this court jurisdiction to hear, inter alia, "the decisions of administrative agencies in contested cases, as provided in sections 14.63 to 14.69." Minn. Stat. § 480A.06, subd. 4 (Supp.1983). By its own terms the Administrative Procedure Act does not provide for review of local agency decisions. The APA, both formerly and as amended, provides for review of decisions in "contested cases." See Minn. Stat. §§ 14.63, 480A.06, subd. 4. A *794 "contested case" is defined as a "proceeding before an agency," § 14.02, subd. 3, and agencies are defined as bodies having "statewide jurisdiction." Minn. Stat. § 14.02, subd. 2. Because the Minneapolis Civil Rights Commission is an agency of local government rather than an agency with statewide jurisdiction, the decision appealed from was not a decision in a "contested case" as defined by the APA, and thus the combination of § 14.63 and § 480A.06 do not confer jurisdiction on this court to hear the matter.

Minneapolis Civil Rights Ordinance and Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act 1. The Minneapolis Code of Ordinances provides for judicial review of decisions made by the Civil Rights Commission: Any person aggrieved by a final decision of a hearing committee or a review committee in a contested case, may seek judicial review in the district court as provided in Chapter 15 of Minnesota Statutes, the Administrative Procedure Act, and the District Court shall review the decision in conformance with the provisions of this Title. Minneapolis, Minn., Code § 141.60(b) (1976 & Supp. No. 6, 6-82). The Administrative Procedure Act formerly Chapter 15 of the Minnesota Statutes, has been renumbered and is now found at Minn. Stat. §§ 14.01-.70 (1982 & Supp.1983). In 1982, when the ordinance was promulgated, the APA provided for judicial review in the district court. See Minn. Stat. § 14.63 (1982). Effective August 1, 1983, however, the APA was amended to take into account this court's existence, and § 14.63 now provides for an appeal to this court. See 1983 Minn. Laws ch. 247, § 9, at 856 (amending Minn. Stat. § 14.63 (1982)). The statute defining this court's jurisdiction is consistent with the amended APA and gives this court jurisdiction to hear, inter alia, "the decisions of administrative agencies in contested cases, as provided in sections 14.63 to 14.69." Minn. Stat. § 480A.06, subd. 4 (Supp.1983). By its own terms the Administrative Procedure Act does not provide for review of local agency decisions. The APA, both formerly and as amended, provides for review of decisions in "contested cases." See Minn. Stat. §§ 14.63, 480A.06, subd. 4. A *794 "contested case" is defined as a "proceeding before an agency," § 14.02, subd. 3, and agencies are defined as bodies having "statewide jurisdiction." Minn. Stat. § 14.02, subd. 2. Because the Minneapolis Civil Rights Commission is an agency of local government rather than an agency with statewide jurisdiction, the decision appealed from was not a decision in a "contested case" as defined by the APA, and thus the combination of § 14.63 and § 480A.06 do not confer jurisdiction on this court to hear the matter.

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Neujahr v. Ramsey County Civil Service Commission · 1985 4 citations

+ 4 more citations in this opinion.

Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. Northern States Power Co. · 1985 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Lopez · 1983 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation · 2013 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.