§ 484.03

City of Saint Paul v. Eldredge · 2011 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Rice v. Connolly · 1992 1 citation

While at one time, quo warranto was also available in the district court, Minn. Stat. § 484.03 (1957), the writ was abolished in that court in 1959 with our original adoption of the Rules of Civil Procedure. See Minn.R.Civ.P. 81.01(2), effective July 1, 1959. With that abolition came the technical loss of that forum as a finder of fact when there existed substantial factual issues. As a practical consequence of that abolition, we have been required on a number of occasions to remand proceedings to the district court to serve as a referee to resolve the factual disputes, 6 and to provide us with an adequate record with which we might effectively resolve the controversy. On other occasions we have denied the petition with instructions that the action be commenced as a declaratory judgment action in the district court 7 or have remanded the proceedings to the district court for trial as a declaratory judgment action. 8

Township of Honner v. Redwood County · 1994 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.