§ 513.50
Citing Cases (3)
Minnesota Court of Appeals
Elfi E. Janssen v. Lommen, Abdo, Cole, King & Stageberg, P. A., Sibley Holdings, LLC · 2014 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
U.S. District Court, D. Minnesota
Ahlgren v. Muller · 2021 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Bankr. D. Minnesota
In re Petters Co. · 2013 2 citations
.The original proposed text of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act had a statute of limitations provision at its § 9, with a four-year limitations period for both actual and constructive fraud claims and a discovery-dependent tolling for up to one year for actual-fraud claims. See 7A Uniform Laws Annotated B Pt. II at 4-5 (2006). (The ULA issuance of the text will be signified "UFTA” after this.) Minnesota may be the only state that excised this whole provision without an express sub*422stitute, when it enacted the UFTA in 1987. 1987 Minn. Laws, Ch. 19, S.F. No. 97, § 9 (enacting Minn. Stat. § 513.50).
.The original proposed text of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act had a statute of limitations provision at its § 9, with a four-year limitations period for both actual and constructive fraud claims and a discovery-dependent tolling for up to one year for actual-fraud claims. See 7A Uniform Laws Annotated B Pt. II at 4-5 (2006). (The ULA issuance of the text will be signified "UFTA” after this.) Minnesota may be the only state that excised this whole provision without an express sub*422stitute, when it enacted the UFTA in 1987. 1987 Minn. Laws, Ch. 19, S.F. No. 97, § 9 (enacting Minn. Stat. § 513.50).