§ 518.09
Citing Cases (9)
Minnesota Supreme Court
Christianson v. Henke · 2013 1 citation [Dissent]
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Minnesota Court of Appeals
In re the Guardianship and/or Conservatorship of Heidi Anne Vizuete and In re the Marriage of Miriam Rose Vizuete v. Edison Marcello Vizuete · 2015 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Marriage of Reed v. Albaaj · 2006 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Marriage of Toughill v. Toughill · 2000 1 citation
Appellant argues that the district court should have granted his motion to change venue. Appellant claims that respondent did not reside in Dakota County on the date proceedings commenced. We review a district court’s denial of a motion for a change of venue in a family law case under an abuse-of-discretion standard. See County of Nicollet v. Haakenson, 497 N.W.2d 611, 614 (Minn.App.1993). Residence has been defined as “an abode, dwelling, habitation or place where one actually lives.” Buckheim v. Buckheim, 231 Minn. 333, 337, 43 N.W.2d 113, 115 (1950). Venue in family law cases is proper in the county where either spouse resides. Minn. Stat. § 518.09 (1998).
State v. Maidi · 1994 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
County of Nicollet v. Haakenson · 1993 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Marriage of Hodges v. Hodges · 1987 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Marriage of Krogstad v. Krogstad · 1986 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Boom v. Boom · 1985 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.