Minn. Stat. § 518.17
Citing Cases (379)
Showing 100 most recent of 379 citing cases.
Minnesota Supreme Court
Christensen v. Healey (In re M.J.H.) · 2018 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Hansen v. Todnem · 2018 27 citations
+ 27 more citations in this opinion.
Christianson v. Henke · 2013 1 citation [Dissent]
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Richards v. Reiter · 2011 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Beardsley v. Garcia · 2008 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State v. Deal · 2007 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
In Re Custody of NAK · 2002 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Rodgers v. Knauff · 2002 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Marriage of Rogers v. Rogers · 2001 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Marriage of Frauenshuh v. Giese · 1999 6 citations
+ 6 more citations in this opinion.
In Re Santoro · 1999 4 citations
+ 4 more citations in this opinion.
Silbaugh v. Silbaugh · 1996 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Olson v. Olson · 1995 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Valentine v. Lutz · 1994 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Marriage of Ayers v. Ayers · 1993 4 citations
+ 4 more citations in this opinion.
In Re the Welfare of D.L. · 1992 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Marriage of Maxfield v. Maxfield · 1990 18 citations [Dissent]
+ 18 more citations in this opinion.
Marriage of Sefkow v. Sefkow · 1988 4 citations
+ 4 more citations in this opinion.
Marriage of Katz v. Katz · 1987 10 citations
+ 10 more citations in this opinion.
In Re the Welfare of J.J.B. · 1986 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Moylan v. Moylan · 1986 13 citations
+ 13 more citations in this opinion.
Marriage of Tell v. Tell · 1986 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Marriage of Pikula v. Pikula · 1985 6 citations
+ 6 more citations in this opinion.
Morey v. Peppin · 1985 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
MacHacek v. Voss · 1985 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Marriage of Rutten v. Rutten · 1984 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Marriage of Gordon v. Gordon · 1983 4 citations
+ 4 more citations in this opinion.
State on Behalf of McDonnell v. McCutcheon · 1983 1 citation
URESA is designed to help obli-gees obtain support expeditiously and economically. When foreign decrees are sought to be enforced, modified, or nullified, courts are confronted with difficult questions of foreign law. By refusing to consider foreign orders in standard URESA actions, these disadvantages are avoided. For these reasons, we adopt the view of those courts which have held that a responding state may independently determine an appropriate level of support to impose on the obligor. See Ibach v. Ibach, 123 Ariz. 507, 510, 600 P.2d 1370, 1373 (1979); Ainbender v. Ainbender, 344 A.2d 263, 265 (Del.Super.Ct.1975); DeFeo v. DeFeo, 428 A.2d 26, 28 (Del.Fam.Ct.1981); Moore v. Moore, 252 Iowa 404, 411, 107 N.W.2d 97, 101 (1961); Commonwealth of Virginia ex rel Halsey v. Autry, 293 Md. 53, -, 441 A.2d 1056, 1062 (1982); Chisholm v. Chisholm, 197 Neb. 828, 830, 251 N.W.2d 171, 173 (1977); Jaramillo v. Jaramillo, 27 Wash.App. 391, 396-97, 618 P.2d 528, 530 (1980). 4 We therefore hold that in a standard URESA action, a trial court is not bound to enforce the ongoing support provisions of a foreign decree. Instead, the court is required by Minn. Stat. § 518C.28 (1982) to apply our domestic law, which in the instant case is found in relevant part at Minn. Stat. § 518.17, subd. 4 (1982):
State on Behalf of Gunderson v. Preuss · 1983 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Weatherly v. Weatherly · 1983 3 citations
A trial court has broad discretion in awarding child custody pursuant to dissolution proceedings. Peterson v. Peterson, 308 Minn. 365, 242 N.W.2d 103 (1976). The applicable statute, however, requires that a grant of custody be based on the best interests of the child. Minn. Stat. § 518.17, subd. 1 (1982). The record in this case does not support a conclusion that Kevin’s best interests will be served by a grant of custody to respondent.
A trial court has broad discretion in awarding child custody pursuant to dissolution proceedings. Peterson v. Peterson, 308 Minn. 365, 242 N.W.2d 103 (1976). The applicable statute, however, requires that a grant of custody be based on the best interests of the child. Minn. Stat. § 518.17, subd. 1 (1982). The record in this case does not support a conclusion that Kevin’s best interests will be served by a grant of custody to respondent.
A trial court has broad discretion in awarding child custody pursuant to dissolution proceedings. Peterson v. Peterson, 308 Minn. 365, 242 N.W.2d 103 (1976). The applicable statute, however, requires that a grant of custody be based on the best interests of the child. Minn. Stat. § 518.17, subd. 1 (1982). The record in this case does not support a conclusion that Kevin’s best interests will be served by a grant of custody to respondent.
Marriage of Jacobs v. Jacobs · 1981 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Application of Saxton · 1981 7 citations
+ 7 more citations in this opinion.
State on Behalf of Forslund v. Bronson · 1981 3 citations
+ 3 more citations in this opinion.
Simonson v. Simonson · 1980 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Berndt v. Berndt · 1980 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Minnesota Court of Appeals
In Re the Marriage of: Beth Amy Gissibl v. Matthew Glen Gissibl · 2025 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
County of Hennepin v. Christina Elizabeth VonderHaar, James Mark Hedquist, ... · 2024 11 citations
+ 11 more citations in this opinion.
Joseph Deidrick v. Clarissa Dozier · 2024 3 citations
+ 3 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Custody of A.W.W: Nicholas Taylor Wehrwein v. Patricia Katrine Hascall · 2024 4 citations
+ 4 more citations in this opinion.
Justin Dean Schultz v. Analisa French Perkins · 2024 4 citations
+ 4 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Dhimble Ali v. Fahria Mohamed · 2024 3 citations
+ 3 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Valentin Arkadievich Povarchuk v. Rebecca Joyce Povarchuk, ... · 2024 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Any K. Arensberg v. Nicholas Shamus Arensberg · 2024 4 citations
+ 4 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Sandee Goldsmith Becker, n/k/a Sandee Scroggs Goldsmith v. Leon L. ... · 2023 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
In Re the Custody of: D. T. E. B., DOB 10-27-2013, D'Jilorian D. Baker v. Diona Marie Hargrett,... · 2023 2 citations
best-interests factors. See Minn. Stat. § 518.17, subd. 1(a) (2022). One factor is whether
best-interests factors. See Minn. Stat. § 518.17, subd. 1(a) (2022). One factor is whether
A. S. v. K. C.-W. (In re C. F. N.) · 2018 3 citations
+ 3 more citations in this opinion.
Aljubailah ex rel. A. M. J. v. James · 2017 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
De Guardado v. Guardado Menjivar · 2017 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Christensen v. Healey · 2017 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
In re the Matter of: Birch Benjamin Hansen v. Suzanne Christine Todnem · 2017 7 citations
+ 7 more citations in this opinion.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: L. R. and J. B., Parents. · 2017 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
In Re The Matter of: Pamela Annette Bowman v. James John Wieczorek · 2017 4 citations
+ 4 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Bridget Kathleen Corrigan, f/k/a Bridget Kathleen Schmidt v. Daniel Thomas Schmidt · 2017 10 citations
regarding each of the best-interests factors as required by Minn. Stat. § 518.17 (2016).
regarding each of the best-interests factors as required by Minn. Stat. § 518.17 (2016).
regarding each of the best-interests factors as required by Minn. Stat. § 518.17 (2016).
+ 7 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Kathleen Jean Rucker v. Kraig Vernon Rucker · 2016 10 citations
child custody, the district court analyzed the 12 best-interests factors under Minn. Stat. § 518.17 (Supp. 2015), and at the end of each discussion noted whether the factor weighed
custody and parenting time. Minn. Stat. § 518.17, subd. 1(a). Minn. Stat. § 518.17, subd.
custody and parenting time. Minn. Stat. § 518.17, subd. 1(a). Minn. Stat. § 518.17, subd.
+ 7 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Matter of: M. J. E. B. v. A. L. n/k/a A. T., E. G., C. L., Below, Ramsey County, intervenor · 2016 2 citations
1 The legislature revised the applicable statutory factors in between this case’s court trial and the district court’s initial order. 2015 Minn. Laws ch. 30, art. 1, § 3, at 271–73 (current version at Minn. Stat. § 518.17, subd. 1 (Supp. 2015)). The “law of the case” doctrine, which an appellate court must follow, generally yields to an intervening change of controlling law unless doing so would alter rights that have matured or have become unconditional. McClelland v. McClelland, 393 N.W.2d 224, 226–27 (Minn. App. 1986). Because neither party contends that the revised version of the statute must apply and due to the significant rights at stake, we apply the pre-August 1, 2015 version of the statute.
1 The legislature revised the applicable statutory factors in between this case’s court trial and the district court’s initial order. 2015 Minn. Laws ch. 30, art. 1, § 3, at 271–73 (current version at Minn. Stat. § 518.17, subd. 1 (Supp. 2015)). The “law of the case” doctrine, which an appellate court must follow, generally yields to an intervening change of controlling law unless doing so would alter rights that have matured or have become unconditional. McClelland v. McClelland, 393 N.W.2d 224, 226–27 (Minn. App. 1986). Because neither party contends that the revised version of the statute must apply and due to the significant rights at stake, we apply the pre-August 1, 2015 version of the statute.
In re the Marriage of: Kylie Jo McCuen v. Joshua William McCuen · 2016 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
In Re the Custody of N.O.K. Jason Michael Krause v. Marissa Lauren Gomez · 2016 12 citations
in light of “the new best interest factors” in Minn. Stat. § 518.17, subd. 1(a) (Supp. 2015).
in light of “the new best interest factors” in Minn. Stat. § 518.17, subd. 1(a) (Supp. 2015).
in light of “the new best interest factors” in Minn. Stat. § 518.17, subd. 1(a) (Supp. 2015).
+ 9 more citations in this opinion.
Jessica Leah Weiss v. Alfred Aaron Griffin · 2016 5 citations
+ 5 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: David Scott Pederson v. Elizabeth Joan Pederson · 2016 9 citations
+ 9 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Nicholas John Kaminski v. Tammy Marie Hackett · 2016 4 citations
+ 4 more citations in this opinion.
Kathryn Suzanne Neufeld, f/k/a Kathryn Suzanne Hare v. Robert Russell Hare · 2016 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Beth Carolyn Potter v. Joseph Leroy Potter · 2016 3 citations
+ 3 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Matter of: Eric Joseph Vacko v. Teri Ann Shults · 2016 4 citations
+ 4 more citations in this opinion.
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF the CHILD OF A.H., Parent · 2016 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: James Walter Shaw v. Barbara Ann Shaw · 2016 6 citations
+ 6 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Timothy Michael Kopp v. Christina Ann Burton · 2016 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Emily-Jean Chinwendu Aguocha v. Ikechukwu Hisa Aguocha · 2016 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Crystol Kevan Caudullo v. Michael Anthony Caudullo · 2016 7 citations
+ 7 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Nathan Francis Gregor v. Dawn Marie Buttera Gregor · 2016 4 citations
+ 4 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Carol Lee D'Costa v. Joseph Francis D'Costa · 2016 4 citations
+ 4 more citations in this opinion.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. S., E. B. and H. J., Parents. · 2016 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Darick Joseph Waguespack v. Jocelyn Alicia Merz · 2016 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: David Allen Anderson v. Lisa Marie Anderson n/k/a Lisa Marie Syverson · 2016 4 citations
+ 4 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Custody of: J. J. O. Thomas Joshua Andrus v. Jennifer Jo Overson · 2016 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Ryan Chetly Ramsammy v. Ashley Marie Ramsammy · 2015 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
J. T. S. v. S. L. v. B. · 2015 3 citations
+ 3 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Jacob Anthony Pulsifer v. Julie Ann Pulsifer · 2015 3 citations
+ 3 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Denise Kaye Newman v. Thomas Joseph Newman · 2015 4 citations
+ 4 more citations in this opinion.
In Re the Custody of: A. J. O. David Ortiz v. Sarah Judith Un · 2015 8 citations
+ 8 more citations in this opinion.
Thomas C. Rubey v. Valerie A. Vannett · 2015 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Kumiko Olivia Highley v. Christopher Alan Kvaal · 2015 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Christina Marie Rexine v. Joey Lee Rexine · 2015 6 citations
+ 6 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Jaime Dawn Starren v. Jason Charles Starren · 2015 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Matter of: Jill Marie Newstrand v. Jamison Robert Arend · 2015 5 citations
+ 5 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Matter of Boyd Jacob Phelps v. Lynnea Diana Sterling · 2015 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Tamara Eileen Goemaat v. Andrew Joel Goemaat · 2015 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
In re the Matter of: Jesse Eugene Schultz v. Christie Jo Ruff · 2015 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Christophe Traore Dit Labarere v. Fatima Lakehal · 2015 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Matter of: Brian Hirabayashi v. Chantha Sorn, County of Dakota, intervenor · 2015 3 citations
+ 3 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Anthony Linus Orner v. Shauna Orner · 2015 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Melissa Jo Butler v. Vance Aaron Butler · 2015 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Anthony Patrick Huber v. Jason R. Vohnoutka, Darlene Heimerl · 2015 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Michael Charles Sasse, f/k/a Michael Charles Sasse Penkert v. Kathryn Elizabeth Penkert, f/k/a Delight Bernice Penkert · 2015 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Moslais X. Vue v. Khue Vue · 2015 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
In re the Custody of T.F. Shawn Kostrzewski v. Amy L. Frisinger, n/k/a Amy L. Budeau · 2015 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
In re the Matter of: Calvin James Omtvedt v. Amanda Marie Jansen · 2015 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Daria Vladimirovna Tinaza v. Justin Andrew Tinaza · 2015 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Ramsey County, Laniesha M. Williams v. Nathan D. Washington, Sr. · 2014 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
In re the Marriage of: Peiliang Yuan v. Te Hao, and In re the Matter of: Te Hao and o/b/o Zhaokui Yuan v. Peiliang Yuan · 2014 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Harold B. Kaeding v. Monica S. Soleta, f/k/a Monica S. Kaeding, f/k/a Monica S. B. Jurupe, Zoraida Franco · 2014 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.