Minn. Stat. § 518B.01

Minnesota Statutes
Source: 2025 Minnesota Statutes. For the official text, see revisor.mn.gov.

Citing Cases (211)

Showing 100 most recent of 211 citing cases.

Minnesota Supreme Court

State of Minnesota v. Melvin Bilbro · 2025 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Edgard Francisco Talave Latino, Appellant · 2025 11 citations

+ 11 more citations in this opinion.

Matter of Welfare of A. J. B. · 2019 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State v. Defatte · 2019 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

State v. Robinson · 2019 12 citations

+ 12 more citations in this opinion.

Burt v. Rackner, Inc. · 2017 1 citation [Dissent]

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

STRIB IV, LLC fka Richard T. Burke I, LLC, Relator v. County of Hennepin · 2016 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. Josue Robles Fraga · 2015 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. Don Antoine Jones · 2014 8 citations

In this case, we consider whether the statutory prohibition against multiple punishments in Minn. Stat. § 609.035, subd. 1 (2012), bars the imposition of separate sentences for multiple current felony convictions involving one victim and a single course of conduct when the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines list the offenses as eligible for permissive consecutive sentences. 1 Appellant Don Antoine Jones was charged in Scott County with stalking, a violation of Minn. Stat. § 609.749, subds. 2(4), 4(b) (2012), and violating an order for protection, a violation of Minn. Stat. § 518B.01, subd. 14(d)(1) (2012). A jury returned two guilty verdicts, and Jones was convicted of both offenses. The district court imposed a sentence for each offense and ordered the two sentences to be served consecutively. The court of appeals affirmed the sentences, and we granted Jones’s petition for review. Because we conclude that the district court and the court of appeals erred by conflating two distinct issues — whether separate sentences may be imposed and how separate sentences should be served — we reverse and remand to the district court with instructions to vacate the sentence imposed for violating an order for protection.

In this case, we consider whether the statutory prohibition against multiple punishments in Minn. Stat. § 609.035, subd. 1 (2012), bars the imposition of separate sentences for multiple current felony convictions involving one victim and a single course of conduct when the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines list the offenses as eligible for permissive consecutive sentences. 1 Appellant Don Antoine Jones was charged in Scott County with stalking, a violation of Minn. Stat. § 609.749, subds. 2(4), 4(b) (2012), and violating an order for protection, a violation of Minn. Stat. § 518B.01, subd. 14(d)(1) (2012). A jury returned two guilty verdicts, and Jones was convicted of both offenses. The district court imposed a sentence for each offense and ordered the two sentences to be served consecutively. The court of appeals affirmed the sentences, and we granted Jones’s petition for review. Because we conclude that the district court and the court of appeals erred by conflating two distinct issues — whether separate sentences may be imposed and how separate sentences should be served — we reverse and remand to the district court with instructions to vacate the sentence imposed for violating an order for protection.

In this case, we consider whether the statutory prohibition against multiple punishments in Minn. Stat. § 609.035, subd. 1 (2012), bars the imposition of separate sentences for multiple current felony convictions involving one victim and a single course of conduct when the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines list the offenses as eligible for permissive consecutive sentences. 1 Appellant Don Antoine Jones was charged in Scott County with stalking, a violation of Minn. Stat. § 609.749, subds. 2(4), 4(b) (2012), and violating an order for protection, a violation of Minn. Stat. § 518B.01, subd. 14(d)(1) (2012). A jury returned two guilty verdicts, and Jones was convicted of both offenses. The district court imposed a sentence for each offense and ordered the two sentences to be served consecutively. The court of appeals affirmed the sentences, and we granted Jones’s petition for review. Because we conclude that the district court and the court of appeals erred by conflating two distinct issues — whether separate sentences may be imposed and how separate sentences should be served — we reverse and remand to the district court with instructions to vacate the sentence imposed for violating an order for protection.

+ 5 more citations in this opinion.

Rew ex rel. T.C.B. v. Bergstrom · 2014 69 citations

+ 69 more citations in this opinion.

Gulbertson v. State · 2014 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State v. Watkins · 2013 2 citations [Dissent]

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

State v. Hayes · 2013 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Schmidt ex rel. P.M.S. v. Coons · 2012 21 citations

+ 21 more citations in this opinion.

State v. Clarkin · 2012 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Rohmiller v. Hart · 2012 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Emerson v. Board of Independent School District 199 · 2012 1 citation [Dissent]

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State v. Franks · 2009 3 citations

+ 3 more citations in this opinion.

State v. Anderson · 2009 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Beardsley v. Garcia · 2008 45 citations [Dissent]

+ 45 more citations in this opinion.

State v. Goelz · 2007 6 citations

+ 6 more citations in this opinion.

State v. Clark · 2007 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State v. Ramey · 2006 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

State v. Bell · 2006 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State v. Robinson · 2006 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

State v. Laine · 2006 4 citations

+ 4 more citations in this opinion.

State v. Barnes · 2006 1 citation

Second, domestic abuse murder is more specific because it only applies to (1) a specific group of defendants who cause the death of (2) a specific group of victims. Domestic abuse murder only applies to defendants who have “engaged in a past pattern of domestic abuse upon the victim.” Minn. Stat. § 609.185(a)(6). Depraved mind murder applies to any defendant. Minn. Stat. § 609.195(a). Domestic abuse murder only applies with a victim who had a domestic relationship with the defendant. Minn. Stat. § 609.185(c)(2); see Minn. Stat. § 518B.01, subd. 2(b) (2004). Depraved mind murder, on the other hand, can apply with “any person” as the victim. Minn. Stat. § 609.195(a).

State v. Asfeld · 2003 4 citations

+ 4 more citations in this opinion.

State v. Colvin · 2002 6 citations

+ 6 more citations in this opinion.

State v. Hoelzel · 2002 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Burkstrand v. Burkstrand · 2001 40 citations

+ 40 more citations in this opinion.

State v. Cross · 1998 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State v. Auchampach · 1995 8 citations

+ 8 more citations in this opinion.

State v. Robinson · 1995 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State v. Grube · 1995 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Baker v. Baker · 1992 18 citations

+ 18 more citations in this opinion.

Vogt v. Vogt · 1990 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

State v. Errington · 1981 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Minnesota Court of Appeals

In the Matter of: Amy Lynn Iverson v. Deven Allen Vanhouse · 2025 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Michael Edmund Sukalski, Appellant · 2025 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. Jairo Missael Fernandez Sorto · 2024 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

In the Matter of: Tammy Alberts v. Joseph Alberts · 2024 4 citations

+ 4 more citations in this opinion.

In the Matter of Rebecca Halling OBO Minor Children v. Francis Halling · 2024 5 citations

+ 5 more citations in this opinion.

In the Matter of: Susanne Natalie Luthens v. Brooks David Hansen · 2024 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. Steve Vang · 2024 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

In re the Matter of: Jimmy Rosas, OBO Minor Child v. Soledad Sanchez · 2024 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

In re the Matter of: Evelyn M. Marsh v. Eric Nyepon · 2024 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. Edgard Francisco Talave Latino · 2024 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

In the Matter of: Monica Medina Robinson v. Fannie Krienke · 2024 4 citations

+ 4 more citations in this opinion.

In the Matter of Ariana Williams and OBO Minor Child v. Santo Che Zarate · 2024 4 citations

+ 4 more citations in this opinion.

David Kaslow Swan v. Heidi Bloedel Moon · 2023 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

In Re the Custody of: D. T. E. B., DOB 10-27-2013, D'Jilorian D. Baker v. Diona Marie Hargrett,... · 2023 1 citation

criminal sexual conduct. Compare Minn. Stat. § 518B.01, subd. 2(3) (2022) with Minn.

State v. Townsend · 2019 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State v. Nicholas · 2019 3 citations

+ 3 more citations in this opinion.

State v. Defatte · 2018 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Aljubailah ex rel. A. M. J. v. James · 2017 7 citations

+ 7 more citations in this opinion.

In re Olson ex rel. A.C.O. v. Olson · 2017 5 citations

+ 5 more citations in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. Gerald Exom · 2017 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. Joseph Greene · 2017 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

In the Matter of the Welfare of: D.N.W., Child. · 2017 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Samantha Raye Meyer v. Robert J. Harley · 2017 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. Christopher Edward Coleman · 2017 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

In the Matter of: Bret William Smith v. Timothy Patrick Lyons · 2017 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. Frederick Raymond Couch · 2016 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. James Michael Chermack · 2016 3 citations

+ 3 more citations in this opinion.

In the Matter of: Ashley Danielle Martin, individually and o/b/o M. M. F. and M. B. F. v. Kent Michael Freundl · 2016 2 citations

committing acts of domestic abuse.” Minn. Stat. § 518B.01, subd. 6(a)(1) (2014).

committing acts of domestic abuse.” Minn. Stat. § 518B.01, subd. 6(a)(1) (2014).

State of Minnesota v. Euric Ards · 2016 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. Abel Gonyamonquah Miamen · 2016 3 citations

+ 3 more citations in this opinion.

In Re the Custody of N.O.K. Jason Michael Krause v. Marissa Lauren Gomez · 2016 4 citations

9 § 518.17, subd. 1(a)(4). Minn. Stat. § 518B.01, subd. 2(a) (2014) defines “domestic abuse”

9 § 518.17, subd. 1(a)(4). Minn. Stat. § 518B.01, subd. 2(a) (2014) defines “domestic abuse”

9 § 518.17, subd. 1(a)(4). Minn. Stat. § 518B.01, subd. 2(a) (2014) defines “domestic abuse”

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

In the Matter of: Chelsea Chantel Hall and o/b/o J. B. A. v. Jamison Robert Arend · 2016 3 citations

+ 3 more citations in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. Joel Thomas Samuelson · 2016 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. Joseph Bullhead · 2016 3 citations

+ 3 more citations in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. Ronald Casa Roby · 2016 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. Laco Knockola West · 2016 4 citations

+ 4 more citations in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. Erick Larkins · 2016 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

David B. Markle v. Metro Metals Corporation · 2016 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

In the Matter of: Colleen Marie Siverling v. Dominic Andrew Bjerke · 2016 5 citations

+ 5 more citations in this opinion.

Kerry M. Mokalla, on behalf of A.M. and A.M. v. Mani M. Mokalla · 2016 3 citations

+ 3 more citations in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. Allen Maurice Moffett · 2016 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. Mackey Keyota Drake · 2016 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. Brian Robert Winsor · 2016 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. Antonio Dupree Wright · 2016 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

In re the Marriage of: James Walter Shaw v. Barbara Ann Shaw · 2016 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

In the Matter of: Carrie Ann Seibert, individually and o/b/o C. A. A. and C. C. A. v. Adam Cain Anderson · 2016 3 citations

Act, Minn. Stat. § 518B.01 (2014), is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. See McIntosh

Act, Minn. Stat. § 518B.01 (2014), is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. See McIntosh

Act, Minn. Stat. § 518B.01 (2014), is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. See McIntosh

State of Minnesota v. Dragos Valentine Bogza · 2016 5 citations

+ 5 more citations in this opinion.

In re the Marriage of: Crystol Kevan Caudullo v. Michael Anthony Caudullo · 2016 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

In re the Matter of: Heather Ray Klammer v. Luke Stephen Klammer · 2016 3 citations

+ 3 more citations in this opinion.

In the Matter of: Natasha June Marie Courtney v. Barry Ishmael McReynolds · 2016 3 citations

+ 3 more citations in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. Tristan Leroy Trice · 2016 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. Christopher Dennis Peterson · 2015 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

State of Minnesota v. Reynaldo Benitez · 2015 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

In re the Marriage of: Denise Kaye Newman v. Thomas Joseph Newman · 2015 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

In Re the Custody of: A. J. O. David Ortiz v. Sarah Judith Un · 2015 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.