§ 541.31

Fleeger v. Wyeth · 2009 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Sigler v. Ecolab Inc. · 2022 20 citations

+ 20 more citations in this opinion.

PHT Holding I LLC v. ReliaStar Life Insurance Company · 2020 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

ILKB of CNY, LLC v. Franchoice, Inc. · 2020 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Thompson v. Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America · 2019 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Villa Lara v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. · 2018 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Rapp v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC · 2014 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Huggins v. Stryker Corp. · 2013 2 citations

. Minnesota’s "borrowing” statute, which provides that another state’s statute of limitations applies if that state’s substantive law governs, expressly does not apply to claims arising from incidents that occurred prior to August 1, 2004. See Minn. Stat. §§ 541.31 & .34. Therefore, Minnesota’s statutes of limitations applies regardless of whether Minnesota substantive law will govern the action. See Fleeger, 771 N.W.2d at 528-29. Additionally, neither party argues that -the action should be governed by Oregon substantive law. .

. Minnesota’s "borrowing” statute, which provides that another state’s statute of limitations applies if that state’s substantive law governs, expressly does not apply to claims arising from incidents that occurred prior to August 1, 2004. See Minn. Stat. §§ 541.31 & .34. Therefore, Minnesota’s statutes of limitations applies regardless of whether Minnesota substantive law will govern the action. See Fleeger, 771 N.W.2d at 528-29. Additionally, neither party argues that -the action should be governed by Oregon substantive law. .

Burks v. Abbott Laboratories · 2009 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Kaye v. Nath Companies (In re Duke & King Acquisition Corp.) · 2014 8 citations

+ 8 more citations in this opinion.