§ 542.10

Minnesota Statutes
Source: 2025 Minnesota Statutes. For the official text, see revisor.mn.gov.

Citing Cases (7)

Minnesota Court of Appeals

In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: LyNell Dupree Alexander. · 2014 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Rouse Mechanical, Inc. v. Dahl · 1992 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Riddle v. Ringwelski · 1990 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Rosnow v. Commissioner of Public Safety · 1989 4 citations

+ 4 more citations in this opinion.

Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co. · 1988 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

OT Industries, Inc. v. OT-tehdas Oy Santasalo-Sohlberg AB · 1984 1 citation

On September 28, 1983, OT-tehdas filed a demand for removal pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 542.10 (1982). In its accompanying memorandum, OT-tehdas argued that OTI’s alleged causes of action did not, in any sub *168 stantial way, arise in Ramsey County. The trial court found that OTI made a sufficient showing that part of the cause of action arose in Ramsey County and therefore the matter would be venued in Ramsey County. We affirm' that decision.

U.S. District Court, D. Minnesota

McQuay, Inc. v. Samuel Schlosberg, Inc. · 1971 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.