§ 566.03

Minnesota Statutes

Source: 2025 Minnesota Statutes. For the official text, see revisor.mn.gov.

Citing Cases (15)

Minnesota Supreme Court

Cent. Hous. Assocs., LP v. Olson · 2019 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Minneapolis Public Housing Authority v. Lor · 1999 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Minnesota Court of Appeals

Cent. Hous. Assocs., LP v. Olson · 2018 2 citations

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Cloverdale Foods of Minnesota, Inc. v. Snacks · 1998 30 citations

+ 30 more citations in this opinion.

Scroggins v. Solchaga · 1996 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Broszko v. Principal Mutual Life Insurance Co. · 1995 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. Obermoller · 1988 2 citations

The Obermollers contend it was improper for the district court to entertain and grant a summary judgment motion because summary judgment unfairly precluded them from exercising their right to a jury trial under the unlawful detainer statute. See Minn. Stat. §§ 566.03, subd. 1, 566.07 (1986). The Obermollers also argue there is a conflict between the rules of civil procedure governing summary judgments and the statutory procedures for unlawful detainer actions because the longer time periods provided in the rules conflict with the provisions in the unlawful detainer statute establishing expedited appearance and trial schedules. We must determine initially *255 whether, under the circumstances, the district court could have resolved the parties’ claims in this unlawful detainer action by summary judgment.