§ 605.09
Citing Cases (8)
Minnesota Supreme Court
Richards v. Reiter · 2011 3 citations
+ 3 more citations in this opinion.
St. Croix Development, LLC v. Gossman · 2007 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Christman v. Christman · 1985 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
In Re Objections and Defenses, Etc. · 1982 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Village Apartments v. State · 1982 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Minnesota Education Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 404 · 1980 1 citation
*669 The term “aggrieved” in Minn. Stat. § 179.68, subd. 1 (1978) is undefined. But this court has interpreted the term “aggrieved party” in other situations. In In re Trust in Estate of Everett, 263 Minn. 398, 401, 116 N.W.2d 601, 603 (1962), interpreting “aggrieved party” under Minn. Stat. § 605.09 (1961), we said that “a person having no interest in the subject * * * cannot be aggrieved * * More recently, in interpreting an “aggrieved party” under Minn. Stat. § 15.0426 (1978), we noted: “The word ‘aggrieved’ refers to a substantial grievance, a denial of some personal or property right, or the imposition on a party of a burden or obligation.” In re Getsug, 290 Minn. 110, 114, 186 N.W.2d 686, 689 (1971). 5
Minnesota Court of Appeals
City of Waite Park v. Minnesota Office of Administrative Hearings · 2008 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Nelson v. Nelson · 1987 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.