§ 609.746
Citing Cases (14)
Minnesota Supreme Court
State v. Pakhnyuk · 2019 15 citations
+ 15 more citations in this opinion.
Munger v. State · 2008 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
State v. Orsello · 1996 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Minnesota Court of Appeals
State v. Perez · 2010 3 citations
+ 3 more citations in this opinion.
State v. Sopko · 2009 6 citations
+ 6 more citations in this opinion.
State v. Ulmer · 2006 4 citations
+ 4 more citations in this opinion.
State v. HA · 2006 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
State v. H.A. · 2006 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
State v. Morris · 2002 8 citations
+ 8 more citations in this opinion.
City of Brooklyn Center v. Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. · 2001 2 citations
• in 1997, Barlow took R.C. on an unauthorized ride-along in a squad car, gave her a copy of her driver’s record even though she had not asked him to obtain it, and in a phone conversation told her the color of her bathroom tile even though he had never been invited to her home, to her knowledge, conduct which the arbitrator stated “may have” violated criminal law in Minn. Stat. §§ 609.746, subd. 1, 609.749, subd. 1;
It is indisputable that Minnesota’s public policy proscribes invasion of privacy, stalking, harassment, and sexual harassment. Minn. Stat. § 609.746, subd. 1 (2000), classifies as a misdemeanor acts of gazing or peeping into someone’s home with the intent to interfere with an occupant’s privacy. Stalking and harassing are also misdemeanors. Minn. Stat. § 609.749, subd. 2 (2000). And Minnesota’s Human Rights Act prohibits sexual harassment that results in the denial of the use or benefit of a public service to a person because of the person’s sex. Minn. Stat. § 363.03, subd. 4 (2000). The arbitrator’s findings support the conclusion that Barlow violated all these laws. Such violations would also constitute violations of public policy. But the dispositive question is whether the arbitrator’s decision, which was a product of the interpretation and application of the labor agreement, violates public policy.
State v. Davisson · 2001 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State v. Orsello · 1995 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State v. Hartwig · 1984 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
U.S. District Court, D. Minnesota
Mwassa v. Presbyterian Homes and Services (PHS) · 2022 4 citations
+ 4 more citations in this opinion.