Minn. Stat. § 60C.13

Minnesota Statutes
Source: 2025 Minnesota Statutes. For the official text, see revisor.mn.gov.

Citing Cases (5)

Minnesota Court of Appeals

Van Guilder v. National Freight, Inc. · 2004 8 citations

+ 8 more citations in this opinion.

Wirth v. M.A. Mortenson/Shal Associates · 1994 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Cox v. Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Ass'n · 1993 5 citations

MIGA appeals the district court’s award and its declaration that, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 60C.13, subd. 2 (1992), the Coxes’ MIGA recovery is not reduced by their recovery from any other state’s guaranty fund. The Coxes filed a notice of review of the court’s determination that, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 60C.09, subd. 1 (1992), they have only one covered claim against MIGA. We affirm that the Coxes have only one covered claim against MIGA and reverse the ruling that the Coxes’ MIGA recovery is not reduced by their recovery from another state’s guaranty fund.

MIGA appeals the district court’s award and its declaration that, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 60C.13, subd. 2 (1992), the Coxes’ MIGA recovery is not reduced by their recovery from any other state’s guaranty fund. The Coxes filed a notice of review of the court’s determination that, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 60C.09, subd. 1 (1992), they have only one covered claim against MIGA. We affirm that the Coxes have only one covered claim against MIGA and reverse the ruling that the Coxes’ MIGA recovery is not reduced by their recovery from another state’s guaranty fund.

MIGA appeals the district court’s award and its declaration that, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 60C.13, subd. 2 (1992), the Coxes’ MIGA recovery is not reduced by their recovery from any other state’s guaranty fund. The Coxes filed a notice of review of the court’s determination that, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 60C.09, subd. 1 (1992), they have only one covered claim against MIGA. We affirm that the Coxes have only one covered claim against MIGA and reverse the ruling that the Coxes’ MIGA recovery is not reduced by their recovery from another state’s guaranty fund.

+ 2 more citations in this opinion.

Gimmestad v. Gimmestad · 1990 1 citation

+ 1 more citation in this opinion.

Wondra v. American Family Insurance Group · 1988 6 citations

+ 6 more citations in this opinion.