§ 611.30
Citing Cases (17)
Minnesota Supreme Court
State v. Lopez-Ramos · 2019 1 citation [Dissent]
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State v. Farrah · 2007 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
State v. Lopez-Solis · 1999 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State v. Dominguez-Ramirez · 1997 10 citations
+ 10 more citations in this opinion.
State v. Mitjans · 1987 1 citation
The statutory provisions relied on by the court of appeals are Minn. Stat. §§ 611.30 to 611.34 (1986), which provide in relevant part:
Minnesota Court of Appeals
State v. Lopez-Ramos · 2018 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State of Minnesota v. Chad Thomas Karnowski · 2017 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State of Minnesota v. Gary Lee Burnett · 2015 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State v. Kail · 2009 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State v. Cham · 2004 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Cooper v. State · 1997 1 citation
Cooper argues his attorney’s failure to provide an ASL interpreter at two-thirds of their pretrial meetings rendered Cooper unable to effectively understand or communicate with the attorney, thus actually or constructively denying him assistance of counsel. The postconviction court found the attorney’s representation of Cooper fell below an objective standard of reasonableness because persons disabled in communication are entitled to interpretive assistance to facilitate full participation in the defense. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181(7)(F), 12182(a) (1994) (prohibiting disability discrimination in full enjoyment of services, including legal services); State v. Dominguez-Ramirez, 563 N.W.2d 245, 253 n. 3 (Minn.1997) (citing Minn. Stat. §§ 611.30-.33 and recognizing that constitutional rights of persons disabled in communication cannot be fully protected without qualified interpreters to assist in legal proceedings); see also State v. Mann, 541 N.W.2d 370, 373-74 (Minn.App.1996) (excluding statement taken from non-English speaker without interpreter, concluding suspect who lacks understanding of legal proceedings cannot make intelligent waiver of rights), review denied (Minn. Mar. 27,1996).
State v. Marin · 1996 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
State v. Her · 1994 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State v. Sap · 1987 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State v. Perez · 1987 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
State v. Mitjans · 1986 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
State v. Lavastida · 1985 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.