Minn. Stat. § 72A.17
Citing Cases (12)
Minnesota Supreme Court
Star Windshield Repair, Inc. v. Western National Insurance Co. · 2009 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Morris v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. · 1986 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Minnesota Court of Appeals
Glass Service Co. v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Co. · 2000 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
O'Reilly v. Allstate Insurance Co. · 1991 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Bregier v. National Family Insurance Co. · 1987 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
Morris v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. · 1985 1 citation
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
U.S. District Court, D. Minnesota
Harmony East Condominium Association v. Falls Lake Fire and Casualty Company · 2024 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Elder v. Allstate Insurance · 2004 4 citations
In this case, Plaintiff contends that Allstate was negligent per se for violating Minnesota’s Unfair Claims Practices Act (“UCPA”). (Pl.’s Mem. in Opp’n at 19-20.) The purpose of the UCPA is “to regulate trade practices in the business of insurance ... by defining ... all such practices in this state which constitute unfair methods of competition or unfair or deceptive acts or practices and by prohibiting the trade practices so defined or determined.” Minn. Stat. § 72A.17; see Morris v. Am. *1101
In this case, Plaintiff contends that Allstate was negligent per se for violating Minnesota’s Unfair Claims Practices Act (“UCPA”). (Pl.’s Mem. in Opp’n at 19-20.) The purpose of the UCPA is “to regulate trade practices in the business of insurance ... by defining ... all such practices in this state which constitute unfair methods of competition or unfair or deceptive acts or practices and by prohibiting the trade practices so defined or determined.” Minn. Stat. § 72A.17; see Morris v. Am. *1101
In this case, Plaintiff contends that Allstate was negligent per se for violating Minnesota’s Unfair Claims Practices Act (“UCPA”). (Pl.’s Mem. in Opp’n at 19-20.) The purpose of the UCPA is “to regulate trade practices in the business of insurance ... by defining ... all such practices in this state which constitute unfair methods of competition or unfair or deceptive acts or practices and by prohibiting the trade practices so defined or determined.” Minn. Stat. § 72A.17; see Morris v. Am. *1101
+ 1 more citation in this opinion.
LaBarre v. Credit Acceptance Corp. · 1998 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
In Re Workers' Compensation Insurance Antitrust Litigation · 1983 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Bankr. D. Minnesota
Hedback v. American Family Mutual Insurance (In Re Mathews) · 1997 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Hedback v. American Family Mutual Insurance (In Re Mathews) · 1996 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.