§ 868.01
Citing Cases (2)
U.S. District Court, D. Minnesota
Kammueller v. Loomis, Fargo & Co. · 2003 2 citations
+ 2 more citations in this opinion.
Thompson v. Campbell · 1994 2 citations
Thompson alleges that defendants discriminated against her on the basis of her sex in violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minn. Stat. § 363.03, subd. 1(2) (“MHRA”). 5 Thompson claims that Campbell’s conduct created a “hostile work environment.” A hostile work environment ex *673 ists when sexual conduct has the purpose or effect of substantially interfering with an individual’s employment or creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment. Minn. Stat. § 868.01. The MHRA is violated when the workplace is permeated with sexual conduct that is sufficiently severe or pervasive to create a discriminatory hostile or abusive work environment.
Thompson alleges that defendants discriminated against her on the basis of her sex in violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minn. Stat. § 363.03, subd. 1(2) (“MHRA”). 5 Thompson claims that Campbell’s conduct created a “hostile work environment.” A hostile work environment ex *673 ists when sexual conduct has the purpose or effect of substantially interfering with an individual’s employment or creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment. Minn. Stat. § 868.01. The MHRA is violated when the workplace is permeated with sexual conduct that is sufficiently severe or pervasive to create a discriminatory hostile or abusive work environment.