Missouri Court of Appeals, 1885

Mister v. Corrigan

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 4, 1885 · Ellison, Other

17 Mo. App. 510; 1885 Mo. App. LEXIS 133

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Sharp v. Q., O. & K. C. Ry. Co. (Mo. Ct. App. 1909)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ellison, J.

When this cause was submitted, by agreement of the parties and consent of the court, the appellant was given ten days in which to file his brief and statement.

Though the ten days have long since expired, there is as yet no brief or statement in behalf of appellant. It is likewise discovered, on examination, there is no assign*511ment oí errors. The law absolutely requires a statement and brief, and they cannot be dispensed with even by agreement. — Dike v. Frank, 52 Mo. 551; Snyder v. Hopkins, 39 Mo. 418. The judgment below is affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.