Pueschal v. Haller
Pueschal v. Haller
Opinion of the Court
The point made by defendants is, that since there was no copy, the items composing the account, served upon them, as provided by section 3681, Revised Statutes, as amended in Laws, 1883, page 125, final judgment could not be rendered at the return term.
At the time of this trial, Jackson county had more than forty thousand inhabitants, and, therefore, fell under section 3514, of the practice act, which provides that in all such counties, actions shall be triable at the return term, and that “when a defendant makes default, the plaintiff shall be entitled to his assessment of damages and final judgment at the term at which the default is made.”
This section makes all actions triable at the return term, and if the default be made, evidence shall be heard .us to the amount of plaintiff ’ s claim (when it is not on a bond bill, or note, etc.). The only effect section 3681
"Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.