1898
499 Missouri Court of Appeals opinions from 1898.
- Ormiston v. Trumbo 77 Mo. App. 310, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Street & Johnson v. Goodale, Barger & Co. 77 Mo. App. 318, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Trumbo v. Flournoy 77 Mo. App. 324, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Heman v. McNamara 77 Mo. App. 1, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Thorn & Hunkins Lime & Cement Co. v. St. Louis Expanded Metal Fire Proofing Co. 77 Mo. App. 21, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Winham v. Kline 77 Mo. App. 36, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Puhr v. Grand Lodge German Order 77 Mo. App. 47, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Barnett v. Sweringen 77 Mo. App. 64, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- St. Louis Trust Co. v. Vincent 77 Mo. App. 76, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Spink v. Mueller 77 Mo. App. 85, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Lincoln Trust Co. v. Tracy 77 Mo. App. 96, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Clark v. Porter 77 Mo. App. 103, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Fischer v. Edward Heitzeberg Packing & Provision Co. 77 Mo. App. 108, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Winkelmeier v. Katzelburger 77 Mo. App. 117, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Philbert & Johanning Manufacturing Co. v. Dawson 77 Mo. App. 122, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Sweet, Dempster & Co. v. Sullivan 77 Mo. App. 128, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Lamwersick v. Boehmer 77 Mo. App. 136, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Watkins v. Edgar 77 Mo. App. 148, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Guntley v. Staed 77 Mo. App. 155, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Clark v. Shrimski 77 Mo. App. 166, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Best & Russell Co. v. Meyerfeld 77 Mo. App. 181, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Sternberg v. Levy 76 Mo. App. 590, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Posch v. Southern Electric Railroad 76 Mo. App. 601, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Edmunds v. Missouri Electric Light & Power Co. 76 Mo. App. 610, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Schwarzschild & Sulzberger Co. v. Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. 76 Mo. App. 623, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- State ex rel. Prosperity Building & Loan Ass'n v. Hanley 76 Mo. App. 631, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Lawlor v. Lawlor 76 Mo. App. 637, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Morrison v. de Donato 76 Mo. App. 643, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- St. Louis Rawhide Manufacturing Co. v. Hill 76 Mo. App. 649, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Garesche v. Hill 76 Mo. App. 659, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Visitation Convent v. Kleinhoffer 76 Mo. App. 661, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Huth v. Dohle 76 Mo. App. 671, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Graesel v. Weber 76 Mo. App. 677, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Journeymen Tailors' Union v. Custom Journeymen Tailors' Union 76 Mo. App. 680, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Harness v. National Fire Insurance 76 Mo. App. 410, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- State ex rel. Copening v. Ryley, Wilson & Co. 76 Mo. App. 412, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Thompson, Payne & Co. v. Irwin, Allen & Co. 76 Mo. App. 418, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Kansas City v. Dickey 76 Mo. App. 437, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- State ex rel. Crow v. National School of Osteopathy 76 Mo. App. 439, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Talbott v. Coteral 76 Mo. App. 447, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Evans-Snider-Buel Co. v. Bank of Atchison County 76 Mo. App. 449, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Schilb v. Pendleton 76 Mo. App. 454, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Eagle Mill Co. v. Caven 76 Mo. App. 458, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Sink v. Loflin 76 Mo. App. 463, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Kansas City v. Trieb 76 Mo. App. 478, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Sublette v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. 76 Mo. App. 480, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- State v. Hopson 76 Mo. App. 482, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Macey v. Carter 76 Mo. App. 490, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Ryan v. Krusor 76 Mo. App. 496, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)
- Holdberg v. Kahn 76 Mo. App. 501, (Mo. Ct. App. 1898)