Holliday-Klotz Land & Lumber Co. v. T. J. Moss Tie Co.
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Huggins v. Jasper (Mo. Ct. App. 1908)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This appeal was taken from the judgment of the court below on a motion filed by the appellant to retax costs. Evidence was introduced and declarations' of law requested at the hearing of said motion, as appears from the bill of exceptions which is presented in full. But it does not appear that any objection was made or exception taken to the court’s rulings on the requests for declarations or an exception saved to the judgment on the motion to retax costs, so there is nothing to review. St. Louis v. Brooks, 107 Mo. 380; Watson v. Race, 46 Mo. App. (K. C.) 546. Filing a motion for a new trial and excepting to the order overruling it does not dispense with the necessity of saving exceptions to previous rulings whose propriety is questioned. American Wine Co. v. Scholer, 13 Mo. App. (St. L.) 345.
The judgment is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.