Donnell v. Miller
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Dent v. Matthews (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
- Stenson v. Lancaster (Mo. Ct. App. 1914)
- Donnell v. Miller (Mo. Ct. App. 1910)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This is an action of replevin begun in the circuit court, in which the plaintiff recovered judgment in the trial court.
The petition does not allege ownership, either general or special, in the plaintiff, and for that reason is fatally defective. It does allege that plaintiff was “lawfully entitled to the possession of,” etc., but that, it seems, has been held not to be sufficient. [Benedict v. Jones, 60 Mo. App. 219.] That case has since been cited in Dillard v. McClure, 64 Mo. App. 488, and Harmon v. Iden, 88 Mo. App. 314. We must therefore hold
The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.