Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Missouri /Cases /Missouri Court of Appeals /

1912

580 Missouri Court of Appeals opinions from 1912.

  • Todd v. Ferguson 144 S.W. 158, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Platt v. Parker-Washington Co. 144 S.W. 143, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Cundiff v. Royal Neighbors of America 144 S.W. 128, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Redford v. Redford 144 S.W. 125, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • State v. Finley 144 S.W. 120, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Bowyer v. Bradford 144 S.W. 145, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Richmond v. Missouri, Pacific Railway Co. 144 S.W. 168, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Geismann v. Trish 143 S.W. 876, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Leader Realty Co. v. Markham 143 S.W. 1104, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Davis v. Barada-Ghio Real Estate Co. 143 S.W. 1108, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Wilkerson v. McGhee 143 S.W. 1198, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • State v. Henan 143 S.W. 877, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • State v. Moore 143 S.W. 879, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • In re Estate of Rooney 143 S.W. 888, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Schmidt v. St. Louis Transit Co. 143 S.W. 867, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Fleishman v. Polar Wave Ice & Fuel Co. 143 S.W. 881, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • R. E. Funsten Dried Fruit & Nut Co. v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad 143 S.W. 839, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Harmon v. United Railways Co. 143 S.W. 1114, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Louisiana Purchase Exposition Co. v. Emerson 143 S.W. 843, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • State ex rel. Tileson v. Coley 143 S.W. 850, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Glidden-Felt Manufacturing Co. v. Robinson 143 S.W. 1111, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Palais Du Costume Co. v. Beach 143 S.W. 852, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Standard Life & Accident Insurance v. Bambrick Bros. Construction Co. 143 S.W. 845, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Deiermann v. Bemis Bros. Bag Co. 143 S.W. 1197, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Leeker v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 143 S.W. 1197, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Boulware v. Victor Automobile Manufacturing Co. 143 S.W. 1197, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • School District No. 3 v. Young 143 S.W. 1197, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • State v. Nicholas 143 S.W. 1198, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Gaedis ex rel. Gaedis v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. 143 S.W. 565, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Brown v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. 143 S.W. 561, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Patt v. Leavel 143 S.W. 833, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Williams v. Williams 143 S.W. 559, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Baker v. Smallwood 143 S.W. 518, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Downs v. Missouri & Kansas Telephone Co. 143 S.W. 889, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Ficklin v. Tinder 143 S.W. 853, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Tamblyn v. Chicago Lead & Zinc Co. 143 S.W. 1095, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • State v. Wilson 143 S.W. 534, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Cantrell v. Crane 143 S.W. 837, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Fink v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 143 S.W. 568, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • State v. Fraser 143 S.W. 545, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Wade v. Douglas 143 S.W. 830, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Johnson v. Fiala 143 S.W. 537, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • J. A. Ruhl Clothing Co. v. Singleton 143 S.W. 529, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Wainright v. Missouri Lumber & Mining Co. 143 S.W. 536, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Steffens v. Fisher 143 S.W. 1101, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • State v. Decker 143 S.W. 544, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • State v. McMurtry 143 S.W. 521, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Carroll v. Hassell 143 S.W. 835, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Cantrell v. Crane 143 S.W. 838, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
  • Elliot v. Thomas 161 Mo. App. 441, (Mo. Ct. App. 1912)
« Prev 1 … 8 9 10 11 12 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑