Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Missouri /Cases /Missouri Court of Appeals /

1919

147 Missouri Court of Appeals opinions from 1919.

  • McCullough v. W. H. Powell Lumber Co. 216 S.W. 803, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Stark v. Cooper 217 S.W. 104, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Francis v. City of West Plains 216 S.W. 808, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • State v. Kitchen 216 S.W. 981, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Windle v. Citizens Nat. Bank Kolterman 216 S.W. 1020, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Bush v. Miller 216 S.W. 989, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Stratton v. Cole and Stratton 216 S.W. 976, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Ingle v. W.O.W. 216 S.W. 787, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Ingle v. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World 204 Mo. App. 597, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Baldwin v. Hanley & Kinsella Coffee Co. 216 S.W. 998, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. Laclede Lumber Co. 216 S.W. 798, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Dietz v. Nix. 216 S.W. 791, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • King v. Gypsum Co. 216 S.W. 992, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Ascher v. Ascher 216 S.W. 576, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Buddecke v. Garrels 216 S.W. 811, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Clarkson v. Laiblan 213 S.W. 1029, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Hilton v. Construction Co. 216 S.W. 1034, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • King v. Oklahoma Gypsum Co. 202 Mo. App. 669, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Hilton v. Universal Construction Co. 202 Mo. App. 674, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Clarkson v. Laiblan 202 Mo. App. 684, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Missouri State Life Insurance v. California State Bank 216 S.W. 785, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Cates v. Cates 216 S.W. 573, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Jegglin v. W.O.W. 216 S.W. 815, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Ex Parte Wernhause 216 S.W. 548, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Hill Ex Rel. Hill v. S. S. Kresge Co. 217 S.W. 997, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Missouri Real Estate & Loan Co. v. Burri 216 S.W. 570, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Hackleman v. Kansas City Railways Co. 217 S.W. 618, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Thornhill v. Masucci 216 S.W. 819, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Kershner v. Kershner 216 S.W. 547, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Lomax v. Cramer 216 S.W. 575, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Sethman v. Union Depot Bridge & Terminal Railroad 218 S.W. 879, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Jegglin v. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World 202 Mo. App. 367, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Highleyman v. McDowell Motor Car Co. 216 S.W. 52, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Aubuchon v. Foster 215 S.W. 781, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Engle v. Brown 216 S.W. 541, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Winner v. Chucart 215 S.W. 905, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Van Horn v. Persinger 215 S.W. 930, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Holcomb v. Mays 215 S.W. 771, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Rieger v. London Guarantee & Accident Co. 215 S.W. 920, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Bird v. Bilby 215 S.W. 900, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Johnson v. Leazenby 216 S.W. 49, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Mossberger v. Mossberger 215 S.W. 760, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Mattero v. Central Life Insurance 215 S.W. 750, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Finley v. Williamson 215 S.W. 743, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Llewelyn v. Cozard 215 S.W. 492, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Bright v. Thacher 215 S.W. 788, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Baumhoff Herkert v. Grueninger 215 S.W. 487, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Young v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. 215 S.W. 496, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Paxson v. Gast. 215 S.W. 515, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
  • Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance v. Lusk 223 S.W. 804, (Mo. Ct. App. 1919)
« Prev 1 2 3 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑