Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Missouri /Cases /Missouri Court of Appeals /

1922

176 Missouri Court of Appeals opinions from 1922.

  • Holt v. Williams 240 S.W. 864, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Davis v. Carney & McColgan 240 S.W. 883, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Rockwell v. Standard Stamping Co. 241 S.W. 979, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Ursch v. Heier 241 S.W. 439, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Goodbar v. Scruggs, Vandervoort & Barney Dry Goods Co. 242 S.W. 129, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Biedermann v. Mermod, Jaccard & King Jewelry Co. 242 S.W. 126, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Dierkes v. Wolf-Swehla Dry Goods Co. 243 S.W. 269, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Carson v. Hunkins 242 S.W. 153, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • County Court of Clay Co. v. Baker 241 S.W. 447, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Carrollton Monument Co. v. Geary 240 S.W. 506, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Ex Parte Hansen v. Edwards 240 S.W. 489, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Beane v. City of St. Joseph & Brittain Investment Co. 240 S.W. 840, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • In Re the Estate of Lewis 240 S.W. 493, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Thomas v. Modern Woodmen of America 260 S.W. 552, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Campbell v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad 245 S.W. 58, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Buchholz v. Standard Oil Co. 244 S.W. 973, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Locke v. Woodman 240 S.W. 498, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Burwell v. Lantz 240 S.W. 471, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Ferry v. Woody 241 S.W. 78, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Hudson v. French 241 S.W. 443, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Galli v. Wells 239 S.W. 894, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Montgomery v. Davis 240 S.W. 282, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Ball v. Grismore 239 S.W. 524, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Young v. Emmke 242 S.W. 161, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Lawrence v. Lawrence 241 S.W. 649, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • McKenzie v. Hall 239 S.W. 154, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Laughlin v. Gorman 239 S.W. 548, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Redman v. St. Joseph Hay & Grain Co. 239 S.W. 540, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Moore v. Dawson 239 S.W. 530, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Jones v. Queen City Wood Works Co. 239 S.W. 532, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Craig v. Bank of Granby 238 S.W. 507, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Shumake v. Norton 238 S.W. 813, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Neosho Grocery Co. v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad 238 S.W. 514, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Calloway Bank v. Ellis 238 S.W. 844, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Robbs Ex Rel. Robbs v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. 242 S.W. 155, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Bray v. American Assurance Co. 238 S.W. 1093, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Stockham v. Leach and Fruits 238 S.W. 853, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • State v. Davis 238 S.W. 522, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Consolidated Flour Mills Co. v. Miller 238 S.W. 510, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Uhlmann v. Domino's Bakery & MacAroni Co. 238 S.W. 511, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Cantrell v. Bobards 238 S.W. 831, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Sanford v. McGinnis 238 S.W. 535, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Spaunhorst v. United Railways Co. 238 S.W. 821, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Robnett v. Griesedieck Bros. Brewery Co. 238 S.W. 532, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Fritschle v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 238 S.W. 850, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • W. E. Bowen Improvement Co. v. Van Hafften 238 S.W. 147, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Bennett v. G. T. O'Maley Tractor Co. 238 S.W. 144, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Murphy v. Electric Park Amusement Co. 241 S.W. 651, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Bartlett v. Taylor 238 S.W. 141, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Wechsler v. Davis 239 S.W. 554, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑