Skip to the main content
Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Missouri /Cases /Missouri Court of Appeals /

1922

242 Missouri Court of Appeals opinions from 1922.

  • Garrett v. Bank of Chelsea 241 S.W. 87, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Curtis v. Bales 241 S.W. 83, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Chillicothe Trust Co. v. French 241 S.W. 984, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • McHenry v. Royal Neighbors of America 242 S.W. 147, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Houston and Fible v. Welch 241 S.W. 991, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Wright Ex Rel. Wright v. Hoover 241 S.W. 89, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Midwest National Bank & Trust Co. v. Parker Corn Co. 245 S.W. 217, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Phelps v. McCaw 240 S.W. 845, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Vance v. Humphreys 241 S.W. 91, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Tweedle 240 S.W. 863, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • First Nat. Bank of Mountain Grove v. Hubbard 240 S.W. 854, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Drake Hotel Co. v. Crane 240 S.W. 859, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • State v. Thomas 240 S.W. 857, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • First Natl. Bank of Joplin v. Swan Mach. Co. 242 S.W. 429, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Ludwig v. Carr 240 S.W. 515, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Legrand v. Security Benefit Assn. 240 S.W. 852, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Holt v. Williams 240 S.W. 864, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Davis v. Carney & McColgan 240 S.W. 883, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Kerosene Motor & Tractor Co. v. Douglass 240 S.W. 836, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Barton v. Brundage 240 S.W. 890, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Youngman v. Miller 241 S.W. 433, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Rockwell v. Standard Stamping Co. 241 S.W. 979, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Ursch v. Heier 241 S.W. 439, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Waddell v. Krause 241 S.W. 964, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Goodbar v. Scruggs, Vandervoort & Barney Dry Goods Co. 242 S.W. 129, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Biedermann v. Mermod, Jaccard & King Jewelry Co. 242 S.W. 126, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Dierkes v. Wolf-Swehla Dry Goods Co. 243 S.W. 269, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Moore v. Davis 241 S.W. 457, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Carson v. Hunkins 242 S.W. 153, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • County Court of Clay Co. v. Baker 241 S.W. 447, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Carrollton Monument Co. v. Geary 240 S.W. 506, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Ex Parte Hansen v. Edwards 240 S.W. 489, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Beane v. City of St. Joseph & Brittain Investment Co. 240 S.W. 840, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • In re the Estate of Lewis 240 S.W. 493, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Thomas v. Modern Woodmen of America 260 S.W. 552, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Campbell v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad 245 S.W. 58, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Buchholz v. Standard Oil Co. 244 S.W. 973, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Locke v. Woodman 240 S.W. 498, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Burwell v. Lantz 240 S.W. 471, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Ferry v. Woody 241 S.W. 78, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Hudson v. French 241 S.W. 443, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Custer v. Kroeger 240 S.W. 241, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Stoll v. Frank Adam Electric Co. 240 S.W. 245, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Flach v. Ball 240 S.W. 465, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Brown v. Brown 239 S.W. 1093, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Parker-Russell Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America 240 S.W. 248, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Sprinkle v. Estate of Fleming 239 S.W. 899, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Koerper v. Glennon 240 S.W. 260, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Thompson v. Portland Hotel Co. 239 S.W. 1090, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
  • Security Printing Co. v. Connecticut Fire Insurance 240 S.W. 263, (Mo. Ct. App. 1922)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑