Missouri Court of Appeals, 1979

State v. Kyles

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 3, 1979 · Crist, Gunn, Reinhard

579 S.W.2d 854; 1979 Mo. App. LEXIS 2790 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Johnson (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

CRIST, Judge.

Burglary second degree.

The jury found defendant guilty. The court sentenced him to four years under the Second Offender Act.

Defendant complains about the court’s comment to the jury, immediately after giving the MAI-CR 1.10 (hammer) instruction: “I will give this to the foreman. Would you retire and decide this case.” He says this additionally instructed the jury, erroneously, as to the necessity of reaching a verdict in language not authorized by the pattern instruction. We disagree.

The jury deliberated for approximately four hours before the “hammer” was given. The instruction was read to, and given to, the jury. The court’s additional comment was not coercive in nature and was not prejudicial to the defendant. State v. Raspberry, 452 S.W.2d 169 (Mo. 1970). The judgment is affirmed.

REINHARD, P. J., and GUNN, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.