Hoelzer v. Hoelzer
Hoelzer v. Hoelzer
Opinion of the Court
Husband appeals from an order of the circuit court modifying a dissolution decree.
A review of the record reveals that the court’s order is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Neither does it erroneously declare nor apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo.banc 1976). An extended opinion would have no preceden-tial value.
Accordingly, and in compliance with Rule 84.16(b), the judgment is affirmed.
. Respondent filed a motion to dismiss this appeal which we deny.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.