Husband’s judgment creditor attempted to attach sale proceeds of land jointly owned by husband-debtor and his wife. On husband’s motion the court dissolved the attachment. Plaintiff-creditor appeals; we affirm.

In Flesher v. Carter, 467 S.W.2d 276[1] (Mo.App. 1971) we held: “It is clear that if a valid tenancy by the entireties existed the funds would not be subject to garnishment and execution to satisfy a judgment against the wife alone.” See also Thummel v. Thummel, 609 S.W.2d 175[4] (Mo.App. 1980).

Considering each point raised we find the trial court’s judgment is supported by the evidence; further the court did not err in declaring or applying the law. An extended opinion would have no value as precedent. Rule 84.16(b).

Affirmed.