Simpson v. State
Simpson v. State
706 S.W.2d 610; 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 3772
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Simpson v. State
Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY OPINION
Defendant’s Rule 27.26 motion was summarily denied. He contended his sentences to two seven-year consecutive terms should have been for concurrent terms. The guilty plea record, after the court’s repeated warnings, showed defendant was satisfied with his counsel and knew he could be sentenced to two consecutive 7-year terms. Thus, the record clearly refuted defendant’s contention. Affirmed in accordance with Davis v. State, 552 S.W.2d 68[2, 3].
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.