Missouri Court of Appeals, 1986

Lane v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 1, 1986

710 S.W.2d 354; 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 3925 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Wood v. State (Mo. Ct. App. 1993)
Clark v. State (Mo. Ct. App. 1987)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial without a hearing of his Rule 27.26 motion which alleged ineffective assistance of counsel at a probation revocation hearing. A Rule 27.26 motion is not the proper procedure by which to challenge the effectiveness of *355counsel at a probation revocation hearing, The state’s motion to dismiss the appeal is denied as moot. No precedential purpose would be served by a written opinion.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.