Hahn v. State
Hahn v. State
725 S.W.2d 168
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Hahn v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. The motion challenged his three consecutive sentences of five years after having pled guilty to forgery, stealing and second degree burglary.
The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law which are not clearly erroneous. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.