Ward v. State
Ward v. State
759 S.W.2d 607; 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 1230; 1988 WL 89583
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Ward v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Movant appeals after the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion following an evidentiary hearing. The findings, conclusions, and judgment of the trial court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 27.26(j).
An extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.