Christensen v. State
Christensen v. State
764 S.W.2d 120; 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 1745; 1988 WL 134971
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Christensen v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
From an evidentiary hearing denying his Rule 27.26 (now repealed) motion, the mov-ant appeals. His claims of insufficiency of the information, fatal variance between information and verdict director, ineffective assistance of counsel, use of perjured testimony, insufficiency of the evidence, and the trial court’s failure to make requisite findings and conclusions are all denied. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.