Missouri Court of Appeals, 1989

Robinson v. State

Robinson v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 14, 1989
766 S.W.2d 475; 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 327; 1989 WL 21718 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Robinson v. State

Opinion of the Court

*476ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant was found guilty of burglary in the second degree and stealing. He was sentenced to two concurrent sentences of 15 years for each charge. His convictions were affirmed on direct appeal. State v. Robinson, 684 S.W.2d 529 (Mo.App. 1984). Movant then filed a Rule 27.26 motion1 alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. After an evidentiary hearing, his motion was denied.

We have reviewed the record and find that the judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

. Rule 27.26 was repealed effective January 1, 1988, and was replaced by Rule 29.15. However, under the schedule provided in subsection (m) of Rule 29.15, any post-conviction action filed before January 1, 1988, under Rule 27.26 "shall continue to be governed by the provisions of Rule 27.26 in effect on the date the motion was filed.”

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.