Missouri Court of Appeals, 1989

Darnell v. Darnell

Darnell v. Darnell
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 25, 1989
768 S.W.2d 669; 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 558; 1989 WL 39282 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Darnell v. Darnell

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Respondent, Clarence Darnell, appeals from a decree of dissolution of marriage. He alleges that the trial court erred in ordering him to pay a $1,500 fee to his wife’s attorney.

The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.