ORDER

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing wherein movant sought to vacate his conviction pursuant to a guilty plea of stealing, third offense, for which he was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment.

The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value.

Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).